I had a boot problem with maveric, too. My solution was to add the apparmor
sevurity rules in virt-manager. Now it works again.
Am 28.10.2010 11:41 schrieb "Harald Hannelius"
<666...@bugs.launchpad.net>:
This seems much like my problem. If I boot the previous kernel 2.6.32-24
from everything wor
This seems much like my problem. If I boot the previous kernel 2.6.32-24
from everything works OK. This makes me suspect that the problems is
within the kernel, did Maverick drop i386 or i686 support or something?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/663191
--
KVM does not boot U
Quoting SqUe (666...@bugs.launchpad.net):
> I have no x86-64 setup on any pc and I am out of time to experiment
> right now. I should notice here that apart from the old one misbehaving
> image, to reproduce it is as easy as making a fresh 10.04.1 i386 MINIMAL
> installation through libvirt or by d
I have no x86-64 setup on any pc and I am out of time to experiment
right now. I should notice here that apart from the old one misbehaving
image, to reproduce it is as easy as making a fresh 10.04.1 i386 MINIMAL
installation through libvirt or by directly using kvm with command line.
After the ins
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. Have you tried running one
of the misbehaving images on maverick on x86-64? If so, did that succeed
or fail?
--
KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal sever images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666180
You received this bug notification becau
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
After upgrade from 10.04 -> 10.10 all the libvirt domains did not boot
and the cpu usage went 100%. Trying to isolate the problem I found that
kvm on maverick is unable to boot ubuntu 10.04 i386 virtual minimal
- setup. I even moved
