[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2012-01-24 Thread Jani Monoses
Do the builders have newer kernels now? If so the testsuite in apr may now pass and the workaround could be dropped. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604753 Title: [eglibc

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-03-21 Thread Loïc Minier
Reverted: apr (1.4.2-7ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low * Revert previous change. I forgot the build servers have an older kernel on which the testsuite fails to pass. Reopens LP: #604753 -- Jani Monoses Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:14:43 +0200 Need to reapply once buildds' kernels are upgraded ** C

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-03-18 Thread Jani Monoses
** Changed in: linaro-toolchain-misc Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apr in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604753 Title: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-03-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apr - 1.4.2-7ubuntu1 --- apr (1.4.2-7ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low * debian/rules: Reenable robust pthread mutexes on armel, now that eglibc process shared mutexes were fixed to use gcc atomic sync builtins. (LP: #604753) -- Jani MonosesF

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-03-18 Thread Jani Monoses
apr without workaround applied passes tests on current natty so glibc is fixed. We still need to revert the workaround in apr (that is part of Debian packaging now as well) ** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-02-21 Thread Ken Werner
I think this the issue has been fixed by #643171. I do not see this testcase failing using a recent (e)glibc and GCC. Could anyone of the original reporters check if it works for them? Please make sure that you use at least glibc 2.12.1-0ubuntu11 and GCC 4.5. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-02-17 Thread Ken Werner
I ran the apr testsuite (svn revision 1071306) several times and I notice that the testlock:test_timeoutcond test fails sometimes because the timer returned to late. Not sure sure if this is related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is su

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-02-17 Thread Ken Werner
I ran the testprocmutex test on a panda board using ubuntu natty alpha 2 and it passed: $ ./testall testprocmutex testprocmutex : SUCCESS All tests passed. $ apt-cache show libc6 gcc|grep Version Version: 4:4.5.1-1ubuntu3 Version: 2.12.1-0ubuntu16 -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-02-17 Thread Ken Werner
I had a quick look into the apr sources. Their locks/unix/proc_mutex.c can map the proc_mutex functionality to various methods: 1) Posix sem implemenation (see mutex_posixsem_methods) 2) SysV sem implementation (see mutex_sysv_methods) 3) pthread implementation (see mutex_proc_pthread_methods)

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-02-14 Thread Steve Langasek
** Tags added: arm-porting-queue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apr in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604753 Title: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing li

[Bug 604753] Re: [eglibc] process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)

2011-02-14 Thread Clint Byrum
Given that the APR task is just for our own development usage, I'm setting the status to Confirmed, and the Importance to Wishlist. When eglibc is fixed, the changes should be reverted, but at the very least, this bug can change to status Triaged at that point. ** Changed in: apr (Ubuntu) S