Dave: again, sorry I can't produce the correct text, as I am not sure
what the exact behavior is supposed to be. Feel free to mark as Won't
Fix, if you think it does not deserve to be clarified.
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Confirmed
--
You received this bug noti
[Expired for eucalyptus (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
https://bug
Dave: I would love to, except I am not too sure what the expected
behavior is. It would be best if someone who actually knows what's
going on write the text in question.
--
Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604400
You received this bug notificat
@Etienne, Thanks for reporting this bug. A fix for this seems to be
suitable for the SRU process, but personally i feel it should be bundled
with another SRU as in itself; it's not serious enough to warrant an
SRU.
Would you mind providing a suitable concise line that it should be
replaced with?
For the record, that "bug" made me lost a couple of hours, and left me
quite frustrated. I think it is serious enough to deserve a "fix" (ie,
clarifying the behavior in the in-line comment).
--
Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604400
You receiv
