This bug was fixed in the package bacula - 2.4.3-1ubuntu1
---
bacula (2.4.3-1ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
* Store sd|fd|director passwords in debconf (LP: #222558)
- added debian/bacula-common.templates
- modified debian/bacula-common.postinst:
+ generate random passwo
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:54 +, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2008 18:36:11 Mathias Gug wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development
> > team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of
> > developers to Fosscamp
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 18:36:11 Mathias Gug wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development
> team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of
> developers to Fosscamp, and think that might be an appropriate forum to
> collaborate on
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 20:20:04 Ante Karamatić wrote:
> I would just like to present my opinion on this one...
>
> This change was introduced in Debian as fix for Debian bug 367105:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367105
>
> Both configurations have valid use cases. I'm kin
I would just like to present my opinion on this one...
This change was introduced in Debian as fix for Debian bug 367105:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367105
Both configurations have valid use cases. I'm kind of in favor of
having bacula file daemon listening only on localhos
Hi Scott,
Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development
team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of
developers to Fosscamp, and think that might be an appropriate forum to
collaborate on a final solution. I'll attend Fooscamp and I'm ready to
discuss th
