AIUI, apt is meant to only balk about immediate configuration for
packages that are essential or are dependencies of apt. libsasl2-2 is
neither in the Ubuntu archive - do you know what modified packages you
might have on your system that would cause apt to treat libsasl2-2 as
essential?
Anyway, i
We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't
heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested
information? Thanks!
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because
@Martin:
Hello - if you still can reproduce this problem could you please attach
/var/lib/dpkg/status (or mail it to me if you have privacy concerns)? I will
try to setup a environment to debug it then.
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
Yo
Martin-Éric, even with APT::Immediate-Configure set to true, I'm unable
to reproduce the failure you see:
$ apt-config dump | grep Immediate
APT::Immediate-Configure "true";
$ sudo sh -c 'LC_ALL=C apt-get install libsasl2-2'
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Readi
Thierry, anything to add?
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-b
Seems that the only way to succeed at upgrading these packages is to add
the following line to /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Immediate-Configure "false";
Two observations:
Seems that the logic for this APT option was recently reverted, if
Google results for "immediate-configure" is any indication. Coul
$ LC_ALL=C date
Tue Aug 18 04:43:21 EEST 2009
$ LC_ALL=C lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
$ LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy libsasl2-2
libsasl2-2:
Installed: 2.1.23.dfsg1-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.1.23.dfsg1-1ubuntu2
Version table:
2.1.23.dfsg1-1ubuntu2 0
5
This issue is still present in Karmic alpha 4:
$ LC_ALL=C sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
lxde-settings-daemon
The following packages
I utilize an APT front-end called 'upgrade-system' to perform my
upgrades.
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu.
--
Ah, I thought it was your aptitude output, not the apt (apt-get) one.
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubu
Thierry, the output already is attached above.
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
Dependency cycles don't prevent installation. The cycle will just be
broken in an arbitrary and non-predictable way. Search "arbitrary" at
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html for more
details. When APT fails, which package does it try to configure first ?
Could you send yo
And if you look at the dependencies, libsasl2-modules and libsasl2-2
indeed depend upon one another, which creates a cycle.
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Canonical Server Team (canonical-server) => Mathias Gug (mathiaz)
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which i
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Here is my intrepid machine upgrading libsasl2-2:
I'm really wondering what I'm doing wrong then. Could some APT or
Aptitude command option cause this to fail?
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Here is my intrepid machine upgrading libsasl2-2:
# lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
# apt-cache policy libsasl2-2
libsasl2-2:
Installed: 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2
Candidate: 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1
Version table:
2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1 0
500 file: intrepid-security/ma
Kees, what do you use to perform the installation? Here, both APT and
aptitude fail as shown above, during an upgrade. This behavior is
verified on both Debian and Ubuntu, using APT and aptitude.
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You receiv
I cannot reproduce this; I can successfully install and upgrade
libsasl2-2 on intrepid, jaunty, and karmic.
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug n
Thank you for assigning this bug to someone. Is there any other info I
should provide?
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Server Team (canonical-server)
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscri
...and still present in Karmic alpha 2.1.23.dfsg1-1ubuntu1. Could
someone please look into this? Thanks!
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
This issue is *still* present in 2.1.22.dfsg1-23ubuntu3.1 (Jaunty).
Could someone please fix this before Karmic releases?
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, wh
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to c
Now that Intrepid is finally released, I notice that the bug is still
present and yet it was reported 9 months ago. What's going on?
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Serv
The workaround in the previous comment has a typo, it should be this instead:
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libsasl2*
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
25 matches
Mail list logo
