[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies

2015-06-19 Thread Thomas Hood
To add that, or any other, option to resolv.conf permanently, add the line options edns0 to the file /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base and then resolvconf will include it in the resolv.conf that it generates. ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You rece

[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies

2015-06-18 Thread Ketil
To get Ubuntu to send EDNS0 queries, I can set this in resolv.conf: options edns0 That might work around this bug in my router in the future. And in case anyone is interested, the wireless router is a Netgear WNR2000v5. I think this case can be closed. -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies

2015-06-18 Thread Ketil
Thanks, I was hoping for some help to find the right place to report this. I poked around some more, and I found out what the problem was. First of all, my wireless router was confused. I rebooted it, and then everything started working again. I did some debugging before I rebooted it, though, an

[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies

2015-06-18 Thread Thomas Hood
Hi. I don't see how resolvconf could be responsible for this problem. Initial observation: it seems that dig gets the correct answer from dnsmasq when it supplies the additional option udp:1280, but the glibc resolver doesn't get the right answer from dnsmasq when it fails to supply that option. Re