This bug was fixed in the package lxc - 1.1.0~alpha2-0ubuntu2
---
lxc (1.1.0~alpha2-0ubuntu2) utopic; urgency=medium
* Cherry-pick usptream bugfix for lxc-usernic test.
-- Stephane GraberThu, 02 Oct 2014 15:01:56 -0400
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed =
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** No longer affects: libcgroup (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you a
@anavarre
if you pass -P to lxc-create, then you must also pass -P to lxc-start.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libcgroup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271000
Title:
lxc-start fails with Out of memory
I cannot confirm the above behavior.
$ sudo lxc-create -t ubuntu -n myserver -P $HOME/lxc
Checking cache download in /usr/local/var/cache/lxc/trusty/rootfs-amd64 ...
Copy /usr/local/var/cache/lxc/trusty/rootfs-amd64 to
/home/anavarre/lxc/myserver/rootfs ...
Copying rootfs to /home/username/lxc/
Or maybe keep -t optional (so it works like always).
And generate the informational message if -t is missing or '-t none' is
specified.
As more + more people use LXC, having this simple message seems like a
life saver for newbies, like me.
Thanks for the info.
--
You received this bug notifica
Ah... now I understand...
So this behavior is actually desirable. For example, to generate an
empty rootfs when creating a new OS template or App template. This way
the rootfs can be manually populated + tested before committing details
to the template.
Seems like having '-t none' might be good
Quoting David Favor (da...@davidfavor.com):
> Correct. It appears the default template processing (default meaning no
> template specified) seems like it could use a bit of work.
Ok, thanks.
> Seems like specifying no template should either throw an error or create
> some form of container that w
Correct. It appears the default template processing (default meaning no
template specified) seems like it could use a bit of work.
Seems like specifying no template should either throw an error or create
some form of container that will start.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Sorry, I'm confused at this point. If I understand correctly, if you do
lxc-create -n test
the container fails to start, and if you do
lxc-create -t ubuntu -n test
then it succeeds?
I agree that it would seem sensible to have the first case default to
the ubuntu or ubuntu-cloud template, howe
Ah... this works...
lxc-create -t ubuntu -n test
lxc-start -n test
My guess is the default container template is suppose to be the template
matching the default OS, which in this case is ubuntu.
Somehow this isn't being done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Hum... Something is seriously amiss...
The log file says /var/lib/lxc/c1/config is being used, which is
incorrect... as /var/lib/lxc/c1 does note exist.
I'm guessing the config file associated with the container (test) should
be used, which is...
/var/lib/lxc/test/config (test instead of c1) + e
Ugh... deinstalled + reinstall cgroup-lite + now additional errors
occur.
Hum... more errors + start.log looks like I'm actually making progress.
Attaching start.log file for entire log...
net1# lxc-destroy -n test
net1# lxc-create -n test
net1# lxc-start -n test -l trace -o start.out
lxc-start:
net1# cat /proc/self/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
udev /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=4071956k,nr_inodes=1017989,mode=755 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptm
If this is still a problem, could you please show the result of
cat /proc/self/mounts
as well as doing
sudo lxc-start -n c1 -l trace -o start.out
and attaching the resulting start.out here?
Note that if you have libcgroup installed, it is recommended to install
cgroup-lite instead.
** Changed
net1# uname -a
Linux net1.bizcooker.com 3.11.0-15-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Mon Dec 9 18:17:04
UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
net1# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 13.10
Release:13.10
Codename: saucy
net1# lxc-version
Hum... I set the package to lxc + it changed to libcgroup.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libcgroup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271000
Title:
lxc-start fails with Out of memory reading cgroups
To man
16 matches
Mail list logo
