>> You need to configure things such that each nameserver listed in resolv.conf
>> can resolve all names you want resolved.
> This requirement feels impossible to meet; the dnsmasq spawned by libvirt
> on my laptop knows only the VMs running on my laptop. It is not possible
> for this dnsmasq to k
Thanks Thomas,
> You need to configure things such that each nameserver listed in resolv.conf
> can resolve
> all names you want resolved.
This requirement feels impossible to meet; the dnsmasq spawned by
libvirt on my laptop knows only the VMs running on my laptop. It is not
possible for this d
Hi Seth,
Just read your bug report again.
It appears that you have two nameservers, neither of which has complete
DNS information. You need to configure things such that each nameserver
listed in resolv.conf can resolve all names you want resolved.
On a LAN, for example, there is sometimes a na
** Description changed:
First, apologies for the complicated configuration.
I use the 'uvt' front-end to libvirt-managed kvm guest machines. I also
have a LAN with a router that does local dynamic DNS configuration with
the client-provided dhcp hostnames.
I would like to resolve ho
If you're still having the issue, the other bug is marked as Fix
Released and you don't think it's a duplicate, I think it would be fair
to unmark this as a duplicate rather than have the bug appear as if it
is resolved.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1126488
libvirt instance of dn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1126488 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126488
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1126488
libvirt instance of dnsmasq in raring fails to forward DNS requests
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Thomas, I'm experiencing this problem on Raring. The uvt version (in
the source code) is:
script_version="2013021401"
I upgraded to Raring completely -- this isn't a frankenmonster :) --
after having successfully working 12.04 LTS and 12.10 configurations.
(Obviously, with earlier versions of uvt,
For the record, please say which version of the uvt script you are
using.
In the description you say:
> This configuration worked for 12.04 LTS, 12.10, but does not work for Raring.
In comment #6 you say:
> I don't think this is a duplicate of bug #1126488 since I made the
> conscious decision t
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1126488
libvirt instance of dnsmasq in raring fails to forward DNS requests
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163147
Title
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1126488 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126488
Robie, this very well might be an abuse of dnsmasq; however, the
upstream author discusses a libvirt-managed dnsmasq instance as a
perfectly well supported configuration in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1126488 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126488
I guess this is the same as bug #1126488.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1126488
libvirt instance of dnsmasq in raring fails to forward DNS requests
--
You received this bug notificatio
The instructions say you should comment out "dns=dnsmasq" in order to
disable "the system dnsmasq". But commenting out that line (and
restarting network-manager) will only disable the NetworkManager-
controlled dnsmasq instance (which listens at 127.0.1.1 in Quantal and
higher, at 127.0.0.1 in Prec
Where did you get the uvt program?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163147
Title:
can't resolve lan hosts (regression)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> Put a line into /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf like so:
>
> prepend domain-name-servers 192.168.122.1;
The following doesn't address the main issue but does seem to me to be
worth mentioning.
Since the introduction of resolvconf in Ubuntu 12.04 it is more
advisable to configure nameserver addresse
Thank you for filing this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better.
I appreciate that this behaviour has changed for you. I understand what
you're trying to do/have been doing.
I always saw this use of dnsmasq as a hack. Does anybody know if it is
actually documented as supported behaviour upstream?
15 matches
Mail list logo
