hibernation should only write the actively changed data (diry pages)
from ram to disk, that definitely wont hit 100% of your physical RAM...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** No longer affects: partman-auto (Ubuntu Quantal)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032322
Title:
Swap space allocation for large memory systems needs improvement
To m
** Tags added: rls-q-tracking
** Tags removed: rls-q-tracking
** Tags added: rls-q-notfixing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032322
Title:
Swap space allocation for la
As ex-lead of Foundations and ex-release manager of 10.10, I'm well
aware of bug definitions, thanks. I also know desktop users "like"
hibernate, despite the project's decision to disable by default. I
think the issue is that the decision on how to handle swap was taken
back when Ubuntu was a pr
As per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
"""
Wishlist: Missing functionality.
* If it is non-trivial to implement, it should rather be written as a feature
specification, see FeatureSpecifications.
"""
It is possible to modify the default recipes, but that will harm the Desktop
installation
Agreed that this is more than just a wishlist. AIUI, for cloud compute
nodes this swap requirement can as much as double the local disk space
requirements, which is not an appropriate outcome. I think we really
need different recipes for server vs. desktop installs, here.
** Changed in: partman-
I disagree with the importance being set to "Wishlist".
"I would say that default settings (e.g. 100% memory) is for the
default/majority of systems"...what systems are you referring to? If
you mean Desktop, sure...but not Server, where it is customary to have a
LOT of RAM in your configuration.
While I would tend to agree, I would say that default settings (e.g.
100% memory) is for the default/majority of systems. If memory on the
machine is 100's of GB or even TBs, custom partman recipes should be
used to tune the machine.
While currently not supported, I would like to see magic factors
** Changed in: partman-auto (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032322
Title:
Swap space allocation for large memory s
