*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498107
This bug is nothing like the duplicate you've assigned to it.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Dustin Kirkland
wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4981
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
If I can't access qemu proper anymore whats the use of having kqemu-*
still available? Many users don't have VT enabled processors - having
qemu proper and kqemu was a very good method of emulating hosts using
the very popular qemu system. Plea
I submished a patch for this on the debian side of things.. but i'd love
to see an official version based on the openssh tarballs and it's own
package full fledged packages.
Josh Ellis wrote:
> Ditto. It's got my vote - this is the number one thing on my wishlist!
>
--
openssh: want hpn-ssh for
I compiled it, it segfaulted a lot.. probably a reason it's abandoned...
Now I just need somebody to swig up python-smbclient :)
Shane
Mathias Gug wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:17:15PM -, whardier wrote:
>> It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salm
Sigh.. I was assuming the changelog link on the packages website pointed
to the most recent changelog. Instead I was looking at an older
changelog that didn't contain that message.
It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salmon up and see whats
going on @ debian.
Mathias Gug wrote:
> It
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Where did packages for python-samba go?
** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
python-samba - where did it go?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249273
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
