To my novice eye, yes they do appear to be duplicates / related.
As a user, I became involved with this partiuclar bug by reporting a
problem I had where an install of vsftpd failed along with some other
packages (Bug# 634085). Because of this I gave the developers who sent
me questions as much in
Since the release of 10.04, I've been spending a lot of time
transitioning a bunch of physical 32-bit boxes to virtual 64-bit
servers. A couple of the new boxes were built, blown away and rebuilt
for various reasons. The problem is I can't remember which box generated
this problem and if it even ex
Below is my aptitude history:
Start with a basic install.
Patch the basic install.
6: Install ssh so I can continue loading from a remote workstation.
8: Install Sun's version of Java
11: Remove some packages I never use.
13: The main command to load a bunch of packages I use. This has always work
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634085/+attachment/1560862/+files/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634085/+attachment/1560863/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
https://bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: vsftpd
I have a script which loads a series of packages whenever I do a fresh
install of Ubuntu. One of the items that's loaded is Zero Ice (Internet
Communication Engine). On this particular install, Ice loaded before
vsftpd. Vsftpd did not like this an
