[Bug 1458323] Re: Asterisk crashes with default install because of pjsip

2015-11-13 Thread god
Pardon, I mean http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/asterisk-13-current.tar.gz of course. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458323 Title: Asterisk cra

[Bug 1458323] Re: Asterisk crashes with default install because of pjsip

2015-11-13 Thread god
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/asterisk-11-current.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458323 Title: Asterisk crashes with default install

[Bug 1458323] Re: Asterisk crashes with default install because of pjsip

2015-11-12 Thread god
A good first step would be upgrading to latest upstream LTS release which is 13.6.0 Chances are - it's already fixed there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458323 Ti

[Bug 1458323] Re: Asterisk crashes with default install because of pjsip

2015-11-11 Thread god
Blacklisting res_pjsip is by no mean "fix" - the chan_sip is legacy stack, the pjsip is the one recommended to use. If asterisk in ubuntu is so broken that pjsip is not working properly than it's good enough reason to switch distro. I think the importance got to be set to critical. -- You receiv

[Bug 16669] Re: Squid: Compile with --enable-ssl

2015-08-03 Thread god
Workaround until ubuntu will finally decide to migrate from ancient squid version is to use ppa: https://launchpad.net/~brightbox/+archive/ubuntu/squid-ssl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1480900] [NEW] ancient squid causes security risk

2015-08-03 Thread god
Public bug reported: All the ubuntu version ship embarrassingly old version of squid which does not even have TLS support in it! This is both useless and insecure. The obvious solution would be to switch to adequate version and get TLS support enabled by default. ** Affects: squid (Ubuntu)

[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2015-07-30 Thread god
Bug trackers are for information related to bugs. If you're unable to contribute something meaningful - go whine someplace else: there're forums, twitter, social networks for that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in

[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2015-07-29 Thread god
> I'm not a systemd hater Don't flatter yourself. Since when exactly inability of some users to run "sudo apt install ntpdate" equals to "systemd hegemony"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1477105] Re: asterisk failed to start under systemd

2015-07-29 Thread god
My bad - turned out to be permission issue which prevented asterisk from reading it's config files. Nevertheless - having native .service file instead of legacy shell script would make this a bit easier to troubleshoot. ** Changed in: asterisk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You receiv

[Bug 1477130] [NEW] timedatectl fails inside container

2015-07-22 Thread god
Public bug reported: lxc-attach -n mycont -- timedatectl Failed to create bus connection: No such file or directory while on the host timedatectl works just fine. lxc Version: 1.1.2-0ubuntu3 on ubuntu 15.04 x86_64 ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 1477105] Re: asterisk failed to start under systemd

2015-07-22 Thread god
Attached are the only 2 modified configuration files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477105 Title: asterisk failed to start under systemd To manage notifications

[Bug 1477105] Re: asterisk failed to start under systemd

2015-07-22 Thread god
** Attachment added: "sip.conf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1477105/+attachment/4432500/+files/sip.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 1477105] Re: asterisk failed to start under systemd

2015-07-22 Thread god
** Attachment added: "extensions.conf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1477105/+attachment/4432499/+files/extensions.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1477105] [NEW] asterisk failed to start under systemd

2015-07-22 Thread god
Public bug reported: Installed asterisk from repo on 15.04 x86_64: Version: 1:13.1.0~dfsg-1ubuntu2 When started automatically on boot it's failing - no binding to ports 5060 for unknown reason. Curiously when started manually (as root of course) asterisk is working just fine. So I guess it's hai

[Bug 1474047] [NEW] pppoe fails inside container

2015-07-13 Thread god
Public bug reported: I've created privileged lxc container on ubuntu 15.04 x86_64 (sudo lxc- create...) added their ethernet interface connected to dsl modem - so far so good: pppoe-discovery from inside the container recognoze it, pppoeconf is able to configure it. The problem is that the contai

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-07 Thread god
Thanks for clarification! Would be kinda helpful if lxc-start could print actual numbers (X quota configured for bridge123, Y is in use). What's the upper limit on those quota numbers? Can I have 100 bridges with 400 interfaces in each? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
lxc-start -n asterisk -F Quota reached. lxc-start: start.c: lxc_spawn: 1000 failed to create configured network lxc-start: start.c: __lxc_start: 1164 failed to spawn 'asterisk' lxc-start: start.c: main: 344 The container failed to start. lxc-start: start.c: main 348 Additional information can be ob

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
Also, what does "Quota reached." mean? What kind of quota is that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1470580 Title: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge To

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
Btw, is there a way to make logging to actually work and log everything? Maybe add --logging-indeed-log or smth like that in addition to existing -l and --logfile? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
cat /etc/lxc/lxc-usernet # USERNAME TYPE BRIDGE COUNT x veth ibr1 8 x veth xbr1 8 x veth ubr1 8 cat .local/share/lxc/asterisk/config # Template used to create this container

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-02 Thread god
Commenting those 2 lines change nothing - same error. Is there way to figure out what exactly went wrong while creating network? The log seems way too brief about it even with debug enabled. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 1470580] [NEW] unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-01 Thread god
Public bug reported: Using 15.04 x86_64 with all the updates installed. I'd like 2 containers to communicate with each other via bridge interface. For that I've created interface as follows: /etc/systemd/network/internalbridge1.netdev: [NetDev] Name=ibr1 Kind=bridge /etc/lxc/lxc-usernet: # USERN

[Bug 1467611] Re: unprivileged lxc containers don't work in remote sessions

2015-06-30 Thread god
cat /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="15.04 (Vivid Vervet)" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 15.04" VERSION_ID="15.04" HOME_URL="http://www.ubuntu.com/"; SUPPORT_URL="http://help.ubuntu.com/"; BUG_REPORT_URL="http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/"; That's another one I think. Let me

[Bug 1467611] Re: unprivileged lxc containers broken

2015-06-29 Thread god
How does this triggering happens normally? I mean should ssh server call something specific explicitly? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467611 Title: unprivileged lxc co

[Bug 1467611] Re: unprivileged lxc containers broken

2015-06-29 Thread god
I still don't get the point about lsh - I mean what's the difference with openssh? Are there some specific step by ssh server with regards to user session setup necessary? Or some specific system-wide configuration required somewhere? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1467611] Re: unprivileged lxc containers broken

2015-06-29 Thread god
cat /proc/self/cgroup 10:cpuset:/system.slice/lsh-server.service 9:memory:/system.slice/lsh-server.service 8:freezer:/system.slice/lsh-server.service 7:blkio:/system.slice/lsh-server.service 6:hugetlb:/system.slice/lsh-server.service 5:perf_event:/system.slice/lsh-server.service 4:cpu,cpuacct:/syst

[Bug 1467611] Re: unprivileged lxc containers broken

2015-06-29 Thread god
cat /proc/self/cgroups cat: /proc/self/cgroups: No such file or directory Hmm.. what ssh server have to do with this? ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 1467611] Re: unprivileged lxc containers broken

2015-06-26 Thread god
What is "regular user session"? Does ssh connection counts or it have to be local console login? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2015-06-04 Thread god
Yes, I thought it would be more clear cause I can't change the title of this bug. Once the patch is applied and updated meta-packages pushed both bugs could be safely closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu

[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2015-05-03 Thread god
It would be much better to replace it with systemd-timesyncd calls and drop ntpdate dependency altogether. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583994 Title: Consider replacin

[Bug 1427654] Re: FFE: switch system init to systemd [not touch] in 15.04

2015-05-02 Thread god
Is there some detailed notes on why upstart is still used for user sessions instead of systemd? Is it just lack of time or there are some technical reasons not to switch to systemd here as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscri

[Bug 16669] Re: Squid: Compile with --enable-ssl

2014-10-30 Thread god
So the only thing needed to fix this bug is to update squid to 3.5 and rebuild with --enable-ssl while having libnettle and gnutls installed? Or there are some changes to package build-depends required? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is