Thank you for the clarification with regard to the differences between the
'dnsmasq' and 'dnsmasq-base' packages.
The pointer to the resolvconf documentation, however, is less on-point,
since my previous report makes reference already to the resolvconf
documentation. Clearly, this isn't a ques
I mean of course that resolvconf documentation refers to using dns-
nameservers (not "dns-server" as I wrote above).
I've added this as affecting dnsmasq-base, too. I think this is, at
least, a documentation bug with regard to the interplay amongst
resolvconf and dnsmasq and their configuration f
