Public bug reported:
when i install by apt-get, appears the message with error of
incompability and no install
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
Package: mysql-server-core-5.6 (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-51.58~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt13
Uname: Linux 3.19.0
th
anks
Em 20/01/2016 22:08, Mike Pontillo escreveu:
> Ah, I just realized that you are running Xenial.
>
> The best-supported way to run MAAS at this time is to run it on Trusty.
> We won't have a Xenial compatible MAAS release until Xenial itself
> releases.
>
> ** Changed in: maas
> Sta
Public bug reported:
sudo apt-get install maas
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: maas-cluster-controller 1.8.3+bzr4053-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.3.0-5.16-generic 4.3.3
Uname: Linux 4.3.0-5-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.19.3-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
Date
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1407757 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407757
** Also affects: libnet-snmp-perl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp
This happens to me, too. Blacklisting the module does nothing.
Reinstalling with a clean config does nothing.
I have had no choice but to roll back the whole system upgrade to a
previous backup.
It is a shame that probably the most important PBX is broken on probably
the most important Linux dist
My comment above refers exclusively to the port of this that was applied
to precise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422388
Title:
Fetch passwords from CloudStack
Not sure how this was verified. Unless the fix for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1089989 is back ported to
precise then any changes to DataSourceCloudStack.py are worthless as it
will not be able to connect to the metadata server.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
** Branch unlinked: lp:~weii666/ubuntu/trusty/dnsmasq/fix-for-1327477
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327477
Title:
dnsmasq not using all DHCPv6 provided nameservers
On 14.04, Netowrk-Manager is fine. The problem is at dnsmasq receiving ipv6
nameservers from dbus.
Here is the proposed fix in parsing ipv6 address length.
** Patch added: "dnsmasq-2.68-fix-ipv6-ns.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1327477/+attachment/4127746/+file
** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Car
** Changed in: maas (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Carlos Hsiao (weii666)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325167
Title:
dpkg: ImportError: No module na
It seems that ppce500 is not a valid host arch for vmbuilder.
Please reference to the following codes in
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/VMBuilder/distro.py:
# Maps host arch to valid guest archs
valid_archs = { 'amd64' : ['amd64', 'i386', 'lpia' ],
'i386' : [ 'i386',
Public bug reported:
Na instalação do apache2.2 server não houve problema, mas ao instalar o
owncloud o servidor começou a bloquear meu acesso e nem na minha rede
interna consegui me conectar, vou remover o apache mas pretendo
reinstala-lo com outro provedor na cloud!
ProblemType: Package
DistroR
Public bug reported:
package samba4 4.0.3+dfsg1-0.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código
de salida de error 255
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: samba4 4.0.3+dfsg1-0.1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
No tengo mucho conocimiento. Sin embargo siempre que el sistemas
actualiza se genera un error de actualizacion de Ruby
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: ruby1.9.1 1.9.3.194-8.1ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
Uname:
Public bug reported:
problema de inicio y recurrencia
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: libboost1.53-tools-dev (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-35.50-generic 3.8.13.13
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-35-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
Architecture: amd
Public bug reported:
While trying to use SaltStack (http://www.saltstack.com/community/) for
configuration management I found that the init script is missing the
"status" verb. While not terribly useful, it is something that Salt uses
to detect whether the service is running or not.
I have attach
Public bug reported:
A instalação ou remoção de pacote de software falhou.
é essa mensagem que esta retornando ao tentar atualizar o sistema
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: php5-common 5.4.9-4ubuntu2.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-28.41-generic 3.8.13.5
Uname: Lin
/share/apport/package-hooks/apache2.py', which is also in
package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-6ubuntu5
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/apache2-utils_2.4.4-6ubuntu2_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
carlos
ProblemType: Package
Dis
I dist-upgraded from 12.04.1 to 12.04.2 and now doesn't work the 100% of
the tries.
** Attachment added: "creation log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vm-builder/+bug/946022/+attachment/3669301/+files/log.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
To remove the notice without checking the disk:
sudo rm /var/lib/update-notifier/fsck-at-reboot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073082
Title:
Login always warns
Public bug reported:
Upgrade version
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-30.47-generic-pae 3.0.57
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-30-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Jan 28 16:3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062802
Title:
package nis 3.17-32ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit
Public bug reported:
1) Description: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04
2) nis:
Installed: 3.17-32ubuntu4.1
Candidate: 3.17-32ubuntu4.1
Version table:
*** 3.17-32ubuntu4.1 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/universe amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049084
Title:
package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: el
subproceso instalado el script post-installation
Public bug reported:
Auto install with apt-get failed. Graphics interface crash at boot.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic-pae 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 2.0
Thxs for your help; I gave up and reinstalled the server; no more problems;
Thxs again
Carlos
--
Sent from my iOffice
On 2012-02-22, at 5:40 PM, Serge Hallyn <931...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the terminal log contains:
>
> ===
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931448
Title:
package quota 3.17-6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status
Public bug reported:
sometime after installing zentyal;
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: quota 3.17-6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-generic 2.6.32.52+drm33.21
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-38-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Feb 1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852601
Title:
package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returne
Public bug reported:
Cada vez que se instala un programa por cualquier vía ( .deb o por
synaptic) o cuando se realiza una actualización, aparece el reporte de
fallo del paquete Bind9, no obstante, siendo yo un usuario que no conoce
de programación, hasta ahora no he notado problemas palpables que
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794443
Title:
package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 failed to
install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-inst
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: amavisd-new
failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-
installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubunt
or should I try to persevere (and trouble you in the process?)
Thanks again for your help and advice.
Regards
Carlos
From: Serge Hallyn <788...@bugs.launchpad.net>
To: carlos_g...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011, 23:14
Subject: [Bug 788348] Re:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788348
Title:
package samba-common 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
r
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
package failed to upgrade/install
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: W
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757258
Title:
Unable to reach instances from their public IP ad
Sorry, I was out of the office for a while and was not able to handle
this request
I used elasticfox, and yes added ssh port:
sysadmin@europe:~$ euca-describe-groups
GROUP build build Build group
PERMISSION build build ALLOWS icmp-1 -1 FROMCIDR
0.0.0.0/3
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu Maverick (Eucalyptus 2.0) I'm not able to reach the eucalyptus
instances, due to the firewall rules. I didn't find exactly the problem,
but I only know that it's iptables which drops packages.
Our setup is, a server with CC, Walrus and SC and two additional servers
Confirmed, it fixes the issue.
Thanks for the speed fixing it!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750565
Title:
Unable to attach an EBS volume
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs m
Public bug reported:
With Maverick's UEC / Euclayptus, there is no way to mount EBS volumes
because libvirt gives the error:
sdh uses scsi:1, rather than scsi:0.
The error and the patch applied upstream can be seen at:
http://osdir.com/ml/libvir-list/2011-01/msg01268.html
As you can see it's a
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729077
Title:
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned e
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: squid
Just performed a normal and typical update from the update manager
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-29.58-server 2.6.32.28+drm33.13
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-29-se
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696586
Title:
package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation
instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-gene
--
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: el
subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de
error 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade:
el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de
salida de error 1
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ub
Public bug reported:
We are no able to create a new volume based on an existing snapshot.
We tried using bigger volumes than the original volume from where the
snapshot was created and also using the same size, but in both cases, we
get the same error:
17:56:11 [JDBCExceptionReporter:pool-10-thr
Is there any workaround to remove those stalled volumes completely?
We are creating big volumes and thus, the volume limit is reached
easily, but we cannot remove completely the volumes that fail on
creation time.
--
euca-create-volume fails at times with Error communicating with Storage
Contro
This is my network configuration:
auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports eth0
bridge_fd 9
bridge_hello 2
bridge_maxage 12
bridge_stp off
pre-up ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:00:00:00:00:01
The macaddress change is the workaround I'm using right now
I know about ufw, the problem is that eucalyptus is not aware of ufw (at
least from what I saw in the source code) and the cloud controller
resets the iptables rules EVERY TIME it's restarted, not just on reboot.
The only documented way to "prevent" it from clear your custom rules is
to use the ipt
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu 10.04 I have problems using libvirt with a bridge because the
TUN devices get random mac addresses and thus, change the bridge device
mac address, which takes the lower mac addres of all devices attached to
the bridge. The main and most critical problem is that, some
I forgot to mention that I'm talking about Ubuntu 10.04
--
Unable to use Eucalyptus' iptables-preload feature with UEC
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579868
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
We are using UEC cloud controller in a server that also runs regular KVM
servers with libvirt and bridge interface.
Everything is working more or less as expected, however, UEC configures
iptable to use NAT for all traffic that is forwarded, even if it's not
for the cloud its
I run sudo dpkg --configure -a
It finished with no indication. The PC din'd repeat the original failure
indication.
I understand this bug can be closed. Thanks.
--
package samba-common-bin 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: package
samba-common-bin is already installed and configure
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43128839/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43128840/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43128841/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Before closing Ubuntu 9.10, There appeares a red exclamation point; clicking
it, it showed a rectangle saying:
The package "rhythmbox 0.12.5-Oubuntu5.2" failed to install or upgrade. I still
did not use rhythmbox after loading ubuntu (yesterday).
Public bug reported:
cempedak:~$ euca-run-instances -k mykey emi-DFE41074 -t c1.medium -n 8--group
more8
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/euca-run-instances", line 198, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/euca-run-instances", line 139, in main
max_count = int(counts[1])
ValueEr
I am not sure either. But we do have some options:
1. if rejecting all requests, it should print out a reason, and end immediately;
2. if accepting up to (VNET_ADDRSPERNET - 3), then it should print out messages
for the refusals (and not even try to start them) (but I guess there is a
timing iss
** Summary changed:
- No instances started if euca-run-instance is run with bug -n
+ No instances started if euca-run-instance is run with a large -n
--
No instances started if euca-run-instance is run with a large -n
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546293
You received this bug notification beca
Hi Etyenne,
Yes, the basic symptom is the same. The difference is that *no*
instances succeed when I run with a -n > 30. This is rather unexpected.
BTW, thank you, adjusted the bug title.
** Summary changed:
- Cannot start more than 29 instances
+ No instances started if euca-run-instance is ru
Public bug reported:
Using the tamarind-based test rig, and ISO images from cdimage
(20100323.2).
I tried to run the maximum number of instances on the setup (using
lucid-amd64-topol, 66 sessions) from a idling cloud. All failed.
Looking at the configuration, I found VNET_ADDRSPERNET="32". I th
Indeed, and sorry for that. Anyway, the rest is still valid: ntpdate
will be run when the NIC is brought up, and will adjust the time on your
system.
Now. I was on my way to close this bug as working as designed, but I am
not as sure of that anymore. If you set the Time/Date to *manual*, then
you
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. I am
setting this package Confirmed/Low: this is a -- at the moment -- known
issue, see http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-
l...@redhat.com/msg15612.html for details.
Apart from the messages in the log (which should happen every time
l
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. This
seems to have occurred because dbconfig-common expects to find a
previous-version 'bacula' database under MySQL, and could not find it.
Have you deleted it?
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Cha
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Can you
give us a sample ntp(date) config where this happens? Also, please be
aware that ntpdate is set to run when an interface is brought up (see
/etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate).
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =>
Looking at the dpkg log, I see that all update requests (since the
beginning of the log, at 2010-03-01) failed for MySQL. I also see the
following lines:
/usr/bin/mysqladmin: connect to server at 'localhost' failed
error: 'Access denied for user 'debian-sys-maint'@'localhost' (using password:
YES
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Did you
also uninstall samba-common before trying to reinstall? I cannot see a
reference to samba-common being uninstalled (purged) on the dpkg log you
provided.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
packa
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Can you
please give us the version for your libdns64 package? It seems
/usr/lib/libdns.so.64.1.0 is empty (/usr/lib/libdns.so.64) is a soft
link to it), and this is why ldconfig is complaining.
Please note that this does not impact you
Public bug reported:
I was following the test scenario at
http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/ServerEConfig, specifically the
"Test Case: Greedy scheduling policy".
Followed the instructions, expecting to find one NC running two images.
Instead I got this:
euca-describe-instances
Fri Mar 19 1
Indeed. Mathias and I just ran by the same error, and I went on and
increased the disk size for m1.small from 2 to 3 G. I was then able to
start the image.
This was done on Lucid Eucalyptus, running the Karmic image from the
store.
--
default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529056 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056
It is indeed a dup of bug 529056. Marking as such.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 529056
default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small
--
Downloaded image from Ima
Public bug reported:
While executing the Image Store images download; this *can* be a dup of
bug 529056, but I do not see any disk error on the log.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Mar 17 18:35:46 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: eucalyptus-cc 1.6.2-0ubuntu14
ProcEnviron:
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41178988/Dependencies.txt
--
Downloaded image from Image store fails to start up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540577
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
works on a testdrive call:
kvm -vga std -m 512 -cdrom /srv/vBox/iso/lucid-server-amd64.iso -drive
file=/srv/vBox/img/testdrive-disk-BoYURX.img,if=virtio,index=0,boot=on
-usb -usbdevice tablet -net nic,model=virtio -net user -soundhw es1370
--
kvm with -vga std is broken since karmic
https://bug
OK. Just installed it. Please be aware that there is a conflict with
current vgabios seabios, which have to be uninstalled (which cause qemu
to be uninstalled also). But a bit of a dance around apt-get and dpkg
gets it done.
Will test tomorrow, gotta go now.
--
kvm with -vga std is broken since
Will test it, as soon as the package is built.
--
kvm with -vga std is broken since karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513273
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubun
No right now, no, but I should be able to next week, when I return to
service one of my machines. I do think this is somehow related to my
hardware, also.
--
daily server ISO install fails with a kernel OOPS in KVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531455
You received this bug notification because
Sigh. Had it again, after a reboot. Rebooted clean to 2.6.32-15, tried
again, failed. Rebooted clean to 2.6.32-13, tried again, worked. So...
reopening.
Current status: working on 2.6.32-13, libvirt* at 0.7.5-5ubuntu9, qemu*
at 0.12.3-0ubuntu4
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: Inva
Closing Invalid -- today's update to libvirt seems to have done the
trick.
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
daily server ISO install fails with a kernel OOPS in KVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531455
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I have just downgraded qemu* to 0.12.3-0ubuntu3; although it still fails
on the 2.6.32-15 kernel, I am able to successfully boot the ISO on
2.6.32-13.
I will try the permutations and zero in the version change that brought
it in.
--
daily server ISO install fails with a kernel OOPS in KVM
https:
I actually found it about two days ago while running the automated ISO
testing from Soren (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutomatedISOTesting). After
a reboot on the new kernel (32-15), the autotest would fail
continuously, with the same OOPS in the VM.
I have not been able to bypass it, and -- just in c
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40092285/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40092286/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40092287/Lspci.txt
** Attachment adde
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
I started having this after the latest updates to Lucid -- at least both
the kernel and qemu.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 73b44a828b993e7076441e3a0979ddbb
CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308
Date: Wed Ma
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38530386/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38530387/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38530388/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
pa
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
package samba-common-bin 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.4 failed to install/upgrade:
problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Jan 28 22:57:55 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: problemas de d
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38522889/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38522890/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38522891/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
fails to install
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Jan 29 10:38:00 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
status 2
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Package: samba-
Hi guys,
I had also the same problem, but doing the changes that Andy suggested
seems to work:
//192.168.16.50/share/documents /mnt/documents cifs guest 0 0
to
//192.168.16.50/share/documents /mnt/documents cifs
nounix,noserverino,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,guest 0 0
Cheers
--
2.6.31 - Can
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34076683/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package libnss-ldap None failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso pre-removal
script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456765
You received this bug not
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libnss-ldap
This problem occurs when I try to uninstall ebox from Ubuntu 8.04, I
write in a terminal sudo apt-get remove ebox-all but libnss-ldap doesn't
uninstall and present problems.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:57:23 20
Now I saw that the console log was attached automatically. That's nice.
If you need translation of some lines, just ask me.
--
package samba 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo novo
script post-removal retornou estado de saída de erro 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4423
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
This message appeared while updating 9.04 today.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ErrorMessage: sub-processo novo script post-removal retornou estado de saída de
erro 1
Package: samba 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1
SourcePack
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32986766/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32986767/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
package samba 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo novo
script po
I tried to update again to see some console errors, but it worked
flawlessly.
--
package samba 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo novo
script post-removal retornou estado de saída de erro 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442372
You received this bug notification because
I've done a fresh 8.10 desktop install and I have to restart squid every
time I boot the PC. Otherwise:
2008/11/06 12:49:34| Warning: Could not find any nameservers. Trying to use
localhost
2008/11/06 12:49:34| Please check your /etc/resolv.conf file
Is it possible to change the service starting
rged). The thing
is, for a given nominal battery voltage, different models from
different vendors behave differently, and there is no way to tell them
apart to ajust the calculation.
--
Carlos Rodrigues
--
No battery charge percentage on belkin usb avr
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215389
You rece
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Arnaud Quette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Carlos, Andrey, Alexander, Jon: can one of you take care of
> backporting this to Testing for -pre2?
With all the stuff happening with usbhid-ups and with a lack of free
time I was actually waiting for som
98 matches
Mail list logo
