Hi All!
On 10 October 2011 13:21, Michael Scheidell
wrote:
> Well, if they were delivered, they wernt blocked, they were quarantined
> either .
I guess you meant that they are not quarantined either. But this seems
to be the case, the "marked-but-delivered" mails are written to the
virusmail fo
Hi Michael!
On 5 October 2011 21:08, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 10/5/11 2:56 PM, Andreas Neustifter wrote:
>
> What is the process for applying a patch to amavis, is there anyone
> specific I can contact about this bug?
>
> this list is best.
>
> can you describe under what circumstances you c
Hi amavis Users!
On 12 September 2011 20:29, Andreas Neustifter
wrote:
>
> I discovered a bug that prevents amavisd-release from working on
> messages that have an empty X-Envelope-To-Blocked line in the headers.
>
> To avoid duplication I posted details and a patch at
> https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Hi All!
I discovered a bug that prevents amavisd-release from working on
messages that have an empty X-Envelope-To-Blocked line in the headers.
To avoid duplication I posted details and a patch at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848055, would you kindly review it and
apply as appropriate?
Thanks
** Patch added: "amavisd-new.X-Env-From-Bugfix.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848055/+attachment/2392051/+files/amavisd-new.X-Env-From-Bugfix.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https
Public bug reported:
When a message is released with amavisd-release that has an empty X
-Envelope-To-Blocked: header field all the recipients are excluded from
delivery and the releasing does not work.
Attached is a patch that rectifies this by not setting
"$have_recips_blocked = 1;" when there
