[Bug 1015223] Re: cloud-init-nonet main process killed by TERM signal

2013-03-03 Thread Sean Channel
ading "normal exit SIGTERM" to /etc/init/cloud-init.conf will probably suppress the appearance of normal termination messages in dmesg. What would be slightly better, though probably overkill in this case, would be a signal handler that somehow pacifies upstart by catching SIGTERM and exiting mor

[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-11 Thread Sean Channel
Sage, thank you much for your comment (#4). Tv, thanks for guidance and letting me play along. The ceph build already separates the main build from docs, and the requirements for building are already quite substantial, so if someone is up to the task of building deb packages on their own then the

[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
This might be more to the specs Tv offered: https://github.com/seanchannel/ceph/commit/08f13c95bf210f433636d00d76b725feee6d3a37 . took out --quiet so you can see what is going into venv, . check for path to sphinx-build . added explicit call to venv python -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
if it's a question of weather to install sphinx or kludge the use of it from system packages, I'd say whichever is less likely to break at some point later. Otherwise; number one goal is Make Tv Happy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-02 Thread Sean Channel
just an update: Tv was right about the use of virtualenv: sphinx has to be *built* in the presence of sphinx-ditaa and asphyxiate, not taken from an installed system package. The burden on virtualenv can still be minimised if all other deps are installed [from platform repos (ubuntu)], but not pyth

[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-01 Thread Sean Channel
I must agree w/ Tv that keeping the docs build separate helps source users who don't need to deal with all that. Many other projects actually do that ('cd doc; make html') due to substantial additional build deps., and I think I can take some cues from that. The top Makefile could just include an

[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-09-28 Thread Sean Channel
I can perhaps add a separate Makefile & debian under doc to build a package for this if you are interested (via github & cephs contrib guildlines). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-09-25 Thread Sean Channel
Got it, but the build prereqs for docs are not needed after they've been generated. I transfered them to a system with none of that stuff and they can be read in a browser or via local server just fine. Once generated, the html docs can go into /usr/share/doc/ceph-doc from a similarly named packag

[Bug 1056103] [NEW] no docs package / html docs

2012-09-25 Thread Sean Channel
Public bug reported: Please add a package for the very nice Sphinx based html docs ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.