** Summary changed:
- incorrect bash-completion for sudo
+ command / directory mixup for completion of args to meta-commands like sudo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
reassigning this to mysql. Packages can provide their own completion
rules and install them with dh_bash-completion. Not every tool needs to
have its completions shipped in bash-completions to be installed on
every system regardless of whether the tool is installed or not.
There's already a scr
The bug is in the core code of bash_completion, in the functions that
handle commands that take other commands as their arguments, e.g. sudo,
nice, and so on. Marked invalid for the etckeeper package, but still
confirmed for bash-completion. (I hope I'm doing this right. If
there's a way to un-a
reported upstream as
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=314893&group_id=100114&atid=413095
** Bug watch added: alioth.debian.org/ #314893
http://alioth.debian.org/support/tracker.php?aid=314893
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
It's a corner case of a directory in the current directory having the
same name as a command. The directory entry is superseding the command
completion.
If you sudo et you get a list of completions. In /etc, the only
entry for etckeeper is with a trailing /, rather than having an entry
for th
Public bug reported:
ethtool -t eth0 offline does the tests, but leaves the routing table
with only the entry for the local network. I had to sudo route add
default gw 10.0.0.1, in my case. The online test didn't do this.
Ubuntu 14.04, ethtool 1:3.13-1
Linux tesla 3.13.0-39-generic #66-Ubuntu
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:34:23PM -, Sam Hartman wrote:
> -Source: krb5
> +8Source: krb5
Is that a typo?
happy hacking,
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(pe...@cor , des.ca)
"The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
Confou
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
found with cruft(8)
$ find -L $(dpkg -L qemu-kvm) -maxdepth 0 -type l -ls
31129340 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Oct 31 15:41
/usr/share/man/man1/kvm-nbd.1 -> qemu-nbd.1
correct target is /usr/share/man/man8/qemu-nbd.8.gz
ii
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libkrb5-dev
Found with cruft(8).
$ find -L $(dpkg -L libkrb5-dev) -maxdepth 0 -type l -ls
168769880 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Oct 31 15:35
/usr/lib/libkadm5clnt.so -> libkadm5clnt.so.6.0
$ apt-file search libkadm5clnt.so.6.0
libkad
I see the message too. lvm2 is the wrong package, though.
pe...@tesla:~$ dpkg -S /etc/udev/rules.d/50-kvm.rules
kvm: /etc/udev/rules.d/50-kvm.rules
** Package changed: lvm2 (Ubuntu) => kvm (Ubuntu)
--
udev output at bootup: NAME="%k" is superfluous
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446329
You r
> This should be already fixed in hardy.
It isn't totally fixed, unless samba is supposed to start before
interfaces are configured by DHCP, and that doesn't count as a bug.
my smb.conf has
interfaces = 127.0.0.1/8 10.255.255.255/8
bind interfaces only = true
so eth0 _has_ to be up and c
11 matches
Mail list logo
