@Serge,
I might have misready your statement about network config.
I do add nettwork config (veth0, dev=virbr0, etc) manually.
There is no /etc/lxc/lxc.conf in my system.
The reason I used a config file snipped for lxc-create was
exactly to get this network virtualization layer into the container
@Serge,
thanks for your comments.
I have experimented a little more. And I found that --path is indead at
the very least misleading:
If I don't use --path, then the config (snippet) given to lxc-create by
"-f" is merged with the config that the template creates. If i do use
paht, then the -f fil
Confirmed: running the same lxc-create command with "--trim" creates a
directly usable container.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925513
Title:
plymouth should not run in
@Serge,
Could you explain why use of --path can lead to X crashing where lxc-create
without --path is not?
My motivation was: I don't want lxc-create to create the rootfs under
/var/lib/lxc.
I need the stuff to be stored elsewhere.
I thought that the --path option in the template was made exactl
Hi,
plymouth running in the container prevents me from using
the container at all, it kills my X instead:
I created a 11.10 container with the following lxc-create command on
freshly installed 11.10:
sudo lxc-create -n ubuntu1 -f ./ubuntu1-template.conf -t ubuntu --
--release=oneiric --path=/dat
I was looking for a reason why Ubuntu kernels dont have CIFS_POSIX_XATTR set?
So the nifty posix acl extensions can never be used with stock kernel.
Should we open a new enhancement bug report for this or was I just not clever
enough searching...
Michael
--
Default ACL not applied on files crea
