[Bug 873194] Re: Cannot build with DEBUG_UDPINT

2016-01-28 Thread LtWorf
Patch was accepted upstream and it will be in their next release. ** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 280053] Re: xinetd enabled is not overruled by disable in service declaration

2013-10-20 Thread LtWorf
Where in the documentation does it say that the disable = yes takes precedence? In the quoted text: Note that the service "disable" attribute and "DISABLE" flag can prevent a service from being enabled despite being listed in this attribute. It _ca

[Bug 868538] Re: /etc/init.d/xinetd kills LXC container's xinetd

2013-06-18 Thread LtWorf
** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868538 Title: /etc/init.d/xinetd kills LXC container's xin

[Bug 868538] Re: /etc/init.d/xinetd kills LXC container's xinetd

2013-05-10 Thread LtWorf
** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868538 Title: /etc/init.d/xinetd kills LXC container's xinetd

[Bug 873194] Re: Cannot build with DEBUG_UDPINT

2013-05-10 Thread LtWorf
Patch forwarded to upstream. https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/pull/4 ** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server T

[Bug 729257] Re: enabling INETD_COMPAT in xinetd forces -inetd_ipv6

2013-05-10 Thread LtWorf
This was done because that's the default inetd behavior and xinetd must be usable as drop-in replacement. You could still use xinetd disabling the compatibility. ** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => LtWorf (tiposchi) ** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu)

[Bug 561475] Re: when sysctl net.ipv6.bindv6only=1, xinetd can not bind to both IPv4 and IPv6 on same port

2013-05-09 Thread LtWorf
** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561475 Title: when sysctl net.ipv6.bindv6only=1, xinetd can not bind

[Bug 561475] Re: when sysctl net.ipv6.bindv6only=1, xinetd can not bind to both IPv4 and IPv6 on same port

2012-04-15 Thread LtWorf
In general the open group defines that parameter to be 0 by default: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904875/functions/xsh_chap02_10.html So all the developers assume it to be 0 unless they set it explicitly in their code. You might want to patch your broken application instead of reportin