[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-28 Thread Jeff Snider
Michael: Yes, that is the correct patch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447 Title: virsh save is very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:/

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-27 Thread Jeff Snider
The page you referenced doesn't include anything that I can find about the ticket priority level. It states that "Stable release updates will, in general, only be issued in order to fix high-impact bugs" and provides several examples. Among them is "Bugs which do not fit under above categories, [

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-22 Thread Jeff Snider
Tested 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.14 on Lucid amd64 with all available updates. Save speed is now approx 3 seconds for a 256Mb guest. Tested virsh with start, stop, save, restore, suspend, resume, shutdown, destroy. Tested guest with smp, virtio disk, virtio net, vnc display. Everything worked as ex

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-21 Thread Jeff Snider
Ok, great! Thanks for the quick response. I did just now get finished testing the packages you attached in #21 using my lucid box. Saves of a 256Mb guest went from ~50 seconds to ~3. So it does seem to fix the issue. I can set up a Maverick box if you need it tested there as well. I checked f

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-21 Thread Jeff Snider
I'd like to help get this fixed, particularly in Lucid. What can I do? Does #21 and #22 still need testing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447 Title: virsh save