[Bug 1278466] Re: [FFe] ceph firefly stable release

2014-05-26 Thread Henrik Korkuc
EC pool is 3+1, and cache is with 2 replicas. default crush rules. I decreased cache to few gigs and [semi]idle cpu usage decreased dramaticaly. So I think it is not a bug, but related to how cache works. I think we can call it "verification-done", unless someone else have objections? -- You re

[Bug 1278466] Re: [FFe] ceph firefly stable release

2014-05-22 Thread Henrik Korkuc
I just recently upgraded to proposed 0.80.1 instead of ppa. There are no scrubbing problems in new version. But my cpu problem looks like is not solved. I suspect cache or erasure coded pools are responsible for problem. But currently I also doing backfilling and data migration so I am not comple

[Bug 1278466] Re: [FFe] ceph firefly stable release

2014-05-15 Thread Henrik Korkuc
http://ceph.com/releases/v0-80-1-firefly-released/ scrubing: "osd: revert incomplete scrub fix (Samuel Just)" about cpu usage, I think this one (but not sure, but I use tiering and disks were idle when CPU usage was high, also OSD restart didn't help (tried twice), upgrade to 0.80.1 helped, all

[Bug 1278466] Re: [FFe] ceph firefly stable release

2014-05-15 Thread Henrik Korkuc
hi, I tested proposed packages on my cluster. I hit 2 bugs with it: some PGs stuck in deep-scrub high cpu usage on OSDs I upgraded to 0.80.1 from PPA, cpu bug did not occur there yet, will see about deep-scrubing. These bugs are known for upstream and were addressed in 0.80.1. I suggest moving 0.