[Bug 1448627] [NEW] package mysql-server-5.6 5.6.24-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

2015-04-26 Thread Diego Lasarte Ojero
Public bug reported: El error se ha producido tras la actualización a la versión 15.04, en donde además ha habido problemas también de paquetes erróneos. El MYSQL de momento funciona y la conexión a la base de datos de prueba me ha funcionado, pero no he tenido tiempo de probar con la aplicación

[Bug 1315501] Re: cloud-init does not use interfaces.d in trusty

2015-03-25 Thread Diego Carrera Gallego
i got same error on new instalation with Ubuntu 14.04. Any ETA on a fix for cloud-init? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315501 Title: cloud-init does not use int

[Bug 1381939] [NEW] Error in cron logrotate 'gzip: stdin: file size changed while zipping'

2014-10-16 Thread Diego
Public bug reported: Hi Sometimes, I get error messages from the logrotate cron daemon: /etc/cron.daily/logrotate: gzip: stdin: file size changed while zipping This error can be solved adding delaycompress in the logrotate configuration file (/etc/logrotate.d/munin-node). The same problem

[Bug 1257857] Re: cgroup-lite fails to install in container in precise

2014-01-07 Thread Diego Amor
misch-9 confirmed!!! is the white space!!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257857 Title: cgroup-lite fails to install in container in precise To manage notifica

[Bug 1207126] [NEW] package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-6ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

2013-07-31 Thread Diego Carrera Gallego
Public bug reported: 1) No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 13.04 Release:13.04 Codename: raring 64 bits 2) package version apache2.2-common 2.2.22-6ubuntu5.1 3) i hope that i can install apache2, but it foun

[Bug 1078699] Re: winbind won't start at boot

2013-01-23 Thread Diego Zuccato
Here's a dump directly from /var/crash Just re-run version check: # apt-cache policy winbind winbind: Installato: 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 Candidato: 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 Tabella versione: *** 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Package

[Bug 1078699] Re: winbind won't start at boot

2012-12-03 Thread Diego Zuccato
IIUC, winbind should be started *before* smbd, not after (smbd uses winbind, if available, for mapping). And actually I don't have smbd installed at all (I just use winbind to authenticate and authorize local users against AD). To collect crash logs I'll have to install another system: the two aff

[Bug 1078699] Re: winbind won't start at boot

2012-11-29 Thread Diego Zuccato
I don't think so, but might be (hard to tell, when speaking of race conditions). In 1083407 winbindd is hung, while in this case it exits. And the machines where I experienced that are actually quite slow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, whic

[Bug 1078699] [NEW] winbind won't start at boot

2012-11-14 Thread Diego Zuccato
Public bug reported: Winbind, by default, gets started too early (S20), resulting in daemon termination and impossible login w/ users from AD. If I connect as a local admin and restart winbind service, all goes well. In /var/log/apport.log : ERROR: apport (pid 1566) Tue Nov 13 11:07:39 2012: cal

Re: [Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2012-05-09 Thread Diego Morales
> Also why does service say it is running when it isn't? Yeah, I saw the same thing. Didn't investigate it enough to make any comments. > Anything else I can try to make tftpd-hpa work from boot? Maybe starting tftpd as an "up" line on the interface definition (/etc/network/interface, man interfac

[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2012-05-07 Thread Diego Morales
Hello Allen, As you may already know, the tftpd-hpa daemon is started on boot by the upstart system, as configured in the file /etc/init/tftpd-hpa.conf. This file contains a line beggining with "start on", which gives the *condition* in which upstart will start the daemon (by running the script th

[Bug 880172] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2011-10-22 Thread diego diego
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880172 Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned erro

[Bug 880172] [NEW] package postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2011-10-22 Thread diego diego
Public bug reported: Trying to install GSmartControl ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 23 03:33:15 2011 ErrorM

[Bug 806176] [NEW] /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/nova/network/manager.py", line 558, in create_networks

2011-07-05 Thread Diego Lalo
Public bug reported: This issue appears after I configured everything and I try to create a network executing the folowing: nova-manage network create 192.168.3.0/24 1 128 this is the trace from nova-manage.log: 2011-07-05 21:09:08,432 DEBUG nova.utils [-] backend from (pid=28830) __get_backe

[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2011-06-15 Thread Diego Morales
I have the same problem, using lucid latest package (5.0-11ubuntu2.1). I have many interfaces configured in this machine, and nic bonding configured. Upstart seems to raise tftp when the first bond interface starts: syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02 kernel: [3.923760] bnx2: eth1: using MSI syslog

[Bug 658176] Re: package samba-common 2:3.3. 2-1ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvió el código de s alida de error 10

2010-10-11 Thread Diego
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658176/+attachment/1683995/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658176/+attachment/1683996/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package samba-common 2:3.3.2-1ubun

[Bug 658176] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3. 3.2-1ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: el subproc eso post-installation script devolvió el código de salida de error 10

2010-10-11 Thread Diego
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba - ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: el subproceso post-installation script devolvió el código de salida de error 10 Package: samba-common 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.6 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba-c

Re: [Bug 628109] Re: package libgssapi-krb5-2 1.8.1 dfsg-2ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso dpkg-deb --control ha restituito lo stato di errore 2

2010-09-02 Thread diego
it was a ram problem. i have 2 banks that are in conflict. now i have installed just one of them and all my problems are solved. many thanks for your support, this is what makes linux better! Diego 2010/9/2 Serge Hallyn <628...@bugs.launchpad.net> > Thanks for reporting this bug and h

[Bug 628109] Re: package libgssapi-krb5-2 1.8.1 dfsg-2ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso dpkg-deb --control ha restituito lo stato di errore 2

2010-09-01 Thread diego
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628109/+attachment/1534563/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628109/+attachment/1534564/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" https://bug

[Bug 628109] [NEW] package libgssapi-krb5-2 1.8.1 dfsg-2ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso dpkg-deb --control ha restituito lo stato di errore 2

2010-09-01 Thread diego
Public bug reported: while updating the system now installed from new ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: libgssapi-krb5-2 1.8.1+dfsg-2ubuntu0.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: W

[Bug 315507] Re: [jaunty] php5-odbc module broken

2009-09-18 Thread Diego Malatesta
uhm, yeah.. and what about 8.04 LTS? Will the fix be ported from karmic? -- [jaunty] php5-odbc module broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mai

[Bug 315507] Re: [jaunty] php5-odbc module broken

2009-09-04 Thread Diego Malatesta
Hi Chuck, I've set up a karmic alpha 5 amd64 test server on virtualbox. r...@karmic:/var/www# uname -a Linux karmic 2.6.31-9-server #29-Ubuntu SMP Sun Aug 30 18:37:42 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux r...@karmic:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubu

[Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-26 Thread Diego Rivera
This defect severely limits the functionality of the OpenVPN client. PPTP is unaffected since the functionality is consistent with the available feature set. VPNC might be a case similar to OpenVPN. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- network-manager[-

[Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-26 Thread Diego Rivera
I sort of expected this to be the case - I'll read up on how to refactor those patches as you metion. However, the important part is that it the patches are built and designed such that if you install the patched version over existing configs, nothing changes functionally - i.e. you have to actual

Re: [Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-26 Thread Diego Rivera
-- network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-s

[Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-26 Thread Diego Rivera
Ok... here's my second (actually, third! :D), cleaner crack at the same patch. The above patch had a couple of bugs in deleting VPN connections (wouldn't be properly deleted), and wouldn't import the new route_mode value from files. Again - it still only covers network-manager and network-manager

[Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-25 Thread Diego Rivera
Here's my first crack at a patch. It's for Ubuntu 8.04LTS (package versions are referenced in each patch filename). It has the GUI change for the OpenVPN stuff only. For PPTP the new "delegating routing mode" doesn't really make sense since PPTP doesn't have a mechanism (that I know of) to trans

[Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-25 Thread Diego Rivera
Ok I've located the culprit logic. It's in NetworkManagerSystem.c - the logic first removes all routes attached to the new VPN interface, and then proceeds to force-feed what it believes to be the correct routing configurations. I think what's appropriate here is the addition of a flag in the DBU

[Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-25 Thread Diego Rivera
Ok I've located the culprit logic. It's in NetworkManagerSystem.c - the logic first removes all routes attached to the new VPN interface, and then proceeds to force-feed what it believes to be the correct routing configurations. I think what's appropriate here is the addition of a flag in the DBU

[Bug 194487] Re: network-manager[-openvpn] doesn't handle properly routes pushed by OpenVPN 2.1_Rc7

2009-08-06 Thread Diego Rivera
Yes, this is still an issue. I can confirm what our friend said earlier about routes being correctly added by OpenVPN and subsequently being removed (presumably by NetworkManager or the NM-OpenVPN plugin). In my view the problem is that the options do not permit the selection of the correct behav

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-24 Thread Diego Malatesta
http://chrisblunt.com/blog/2009/05/01/php-fixing-mismatched-canaries- how-to-remove-suhosin-from-debianubuntu-packages/ here the guy talks about mssql_query causing the canary mismatch. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
Ok, I've tried to reproduce the problem on Ubuntu 8.04.3 i386 and it does NOT show up, so it seems to be related to the amd64 architecture as Ondrej suggested. let me know if I have to do some more tests. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
Ondrej, sure as soon as I'm done with this vm I'm building I'll try with i386. It's not that I don't care, but as we're migrating tons of stuff around and this migration has to be finished soon, I really need the odbc thing working asap, so that's why I don't mind the buffer overflow for now, if I

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
I've reproduced the problem on a 9.04 amd64 fully updated, same configuration as above. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-se

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
To be honest it wouldn't be a problem for me if the simulation mode actually worked. I don't really mind if the odbc functions are badly coded (or whatever). What I do mind is suhosin breaking my scripts without a way to prevent it which doesn't include recompiling php without the patch. But of co

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
Ok I was able to reproduce the problem on a new VM Steps: 1) Create fresh vm: done, installed Ubuntu 8.04.2 amd64 as denoted by # lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS (it shows .3 because I issued the command after the update I th

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
Darn there should be an edit function for comments here... I forgot to mention an essential thing, the ubuntu release is the AMD64 one. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
erhm, of course in my test script in the odbc_exec function I've specified the connection parameter, I just missed it here in the comment. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, wh

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-20 Thread Diego Malatesta
Jonathan, thanks for taking the time to post an exhaustive reply. I'm creating a new VM right now to do a complete test as you suggested, but as that's not going to reproduce our real world situation, I'm going to post the details of the actual machine where the thing is happening. Later on I'll

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-19 Thread Diego Malatesta
The error I get is the same StephenA reported: "ALERT - canary mismatch on efree() - heap overflow detected (attacker '', file '')" and I get it by calling odbc_execute() or odbc_exec() with any query. The script I used to reproduce the problem is a simple test script with just the db connection

[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch

2009-07-17 Thread Diego Malatesta
I have the same problem as the other guys. And doing: > # echo "suhosin.simulation = on" >> /etc/php5/conf.d/suhosin.ini > > Restarting the webserver and you will be fine. does not solve the problem. phpinfo() shows the flag as on, but the php scripts which cause the error still stop being exec