Hi Markus,
sorry to get to this so late.
I couldn't reproduce that today.
But then "a while even under non heavy server" is kind of unspecific.
Also there were plenty of updates to the packages
If this really still applies to your environment please share more detail on
what you do to reproduce
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1428288
Thanks for letting us know what solved that for you, closing bug.
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13150
According to Seths comment and that nobody else jumped in with the same
issue I'd consider setting the bug as incomplete as there are non-
deprecated new ways available.
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308570
T
Hi,
it looks like some files were removed manually.
modified.conffile..etc.apache2.conf.available.charset.conf: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.apache2.conf.available.localized.error.pages.conf:
[deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.apache2.conf.available.other.vhosts.access.log.conf:
[deleted]
modi
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407136
Title:
Apache 2.4 --- "authz_core" logs lots of messages
To m
I agree to Robies summary that this should be filed and discussed with
Debian first to avoid getting a Delta for this.
Chaskiel, could I ask you to be so kind and open/discuss that with Debian.
Especially since you own the system where this happened first.
Thanks in advance if you do so, and let
Hi Karl-Phillip,
I don't want to copy&paste the normal "please make a better bug report" to an
really active community member.
But please could you share a bit more on what you did in terms of configuration
and commands to get to your issue, so that it can be reproduced.
Because when just control
I wonder if this bug might be related.
Similar errors also using wsgi to make it more reproducable, ...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1428796
Did you set up something similar for your wsgi and if so would it
qualify as a dup to the other bug or should we keep it separate?
Hi,
I was trying to reproduce your issue:
mkdir -p /var/www/localized-error-pages/
cp /usr/share/apache2/error/include/* /var/www/localized-error-pages/
*made a slight change to the bottom.html in there so I recognize the localized
error.
Uncommenting and adapting in
/etc/apache2/conf-available
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs
Hi,
you are right that default configurations should be sane.
I totally like your report on the potential DOS, by keeping a connection open
and so stalling the restart forever.
So I don't just want you or me to close it.
But then the GracefulShutdownTimeout being zero is the apache default - not o
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs
Thank you Hikari Kobayashi for reporting the issue and even doing the
work identifying the patch.
This was backported to 2.4.11 and therefore obviously is also in 2.4.18.
Thereby Xenial and Wily are not affected.
Note: This is a regression 2.2.22 (precise) -> 2.4.7 (trusty) since migrating
from
Hi David,
I tried reproducing this while triaging to confirm and set bug status.
In a trivial loop like:
for i in {1..100}; do echo $i; service apache2 restart; done;
It almost always blocks it by
Mar 31 11:09:34 xenial-tests systemd[1]: apache2.service: Start request
repeated too quickly.
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Tags added: notserv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to powernap in Ubuntu.
https://
That is a feature missing upstream, so reassigning
** Package changed: iptraf (Ubuntu) => iptraf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to iptraf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075409
Title:
Iptraf does not suppor
** Tags added: notserv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pm-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019362
Title:
Use suspend_hybrid where supported
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
** Tags added: notserv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pm-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970281
Title:
Suspend test fails for System Testing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
** Tags added: notserv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libsdl1.2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930219
Title:
Wrong color in SDL dependent application on Tegra2
To manage notifications about this bug go t
** Tags added: notserv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pm-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928576
Title:
No password prompt (occasionally) on resume, causes unity problems
To manage notifications abou
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1398001 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1398001
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1398001
package clamav 0.98.5+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 failed to install/upgrade:
beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad
--
You received this bug notificatio
Hi rolfc,
thank you for reporting that bug.
It appears on your system some conffiles were deleted.
modified.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.usr.sbin.clamd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.init.d.clamav.daemon: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.clamav.daemon: [deleted]
modi
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for you report - I've seen several such reports popping up around the
same time.
Almost all others had success with purging and reinstalling the clamav packages.
I'd ask you to do the same.
I set the bug to incomplete to ease scanning open bugs, please feel free
to reopen if the
Hi Ken,
this bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being
fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the status of your
own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing
a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can l
It seems that some or all of the package was removed manually.
Therefore the upgrade is failing
>From your logs:
chown: invalid user: ‘clamav:adm’
...
modified.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.usr.sbin.clamd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.init.d.clamav.daemon: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
** Changed in: tgt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: tgt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tgt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555700
Title:
P
Since so many things changed since this - admittedly embarrassing old -
bug was reported I thought I retest it before the next LTS comes out.
I looked at the Xenial content and found stuff like:
Not only is it specified "After network.target", but on top there is
/etc/network/if-up.d/openssh-serv
Hi,
in Xenial 2.7.2-4ubuntu1 got merged.
The issue that our delta solved by dropping of the systemd service, seems
solved in Debian >=2.7.2
The Debian Changelog part in 2.7.2-2 is:
* Add wrappers that check the MODE in /etc/nut/nut.conf to avoid starting
the daemons if nut is not
[Impact]
* The bug is a segfault on yppasswd rendering users unable to change their
passwords
* justification for the SRU is the continued request by users and the fact
that it is a very minimal change
* the fix ensures that a lib accessing data unconditionally only gets called
if the values
Subscribing the ~ubuntu-sru Team to evaluate and consider this for a
Trusty SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204530
Title:
yppasswd results in a segmentation fault
** Patch added: "Debdiff for Trusty"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1204530/+attachment/4608491/+files/bug-1204530-SRU-nis_3.17-32ubuntu6-to-nis_3.17-32ubuntu7.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
Ok, I did the backport.
This package is somewhat scary old at some places (no patches, dh compatibility
level 1 - well undefined).
Yet I was able to keep changes minimal and the changes that went into
the Debian upgrade from .33 to .34 applied as is.
It is building fine in trusty.
I revived my
Adding two more to the list of working and tested stability fixes:
commit 3b1e3e4e362453df8cecbc6d481444be8b84326e
virtio: fix descriptors pointing to the same buffer
commit c680a4a88c4312068f60937a7ba51eac8211c9a6
virtio: fix crash in statistics functions
--
You received this bug notific
After quite some analysis and debugging I could identify an issue regarding
double configuring the device.
Daniele replied to the mailing list request I had and suggested backporting an
virtio fix that came after 2.2.
That worked well, with backporting these I can get it to work now.
Thanks Dani
Reading through dh_strip since we have no old -dbg package to care about
it might be enough to just do:
export EXTRA_CFLAGS = -g
- the export makes sure we build it for all binaries
- dh_strip magically does the right thing and should create a dbgsym packages
as appropriate
--
You received thi
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 60cf704..61e3475 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -79,3 +79,16 @@ Description: Data Plane Development Kit (basic
development files)
This package contains the basic headers and library files required to
build external applicat
)
Importance: High
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
Actually these might be good candidates to go to
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/.
Once my testing is done I should suggest that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155998
Info on progress.
No feedback from communities so far.
After various other DPDK fixes took 3/4 of my day I set up a more thorough
debugging environment derived from my testing env, but the real debugging
itself has to start tomorrow morning.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I had a focus on identifying:
- only patches to components that are enabled in our packaging
- issues that have a real chance to occur on the usage we expect for 16.04
timeframe
- patches that are small, so review is not overly complex
- apply without manual adaption (offset ok to some extend, no
Martin since I'm happy you work with that code base I'd recommend you create a
test setup based on virtio.
You will still be blocked on bug 1559912 for now, but I'm working on that this
week and stil hope to get some upstream support.
I'll reject this bug for the given reasons now, but please ca
I checked the other default disabled drivers.
To all some kind of incompleteness, non-support or being only stubs applies.
It could be said, that the same is true for the virtual ones we enable like
PCAP and XEN.
But there is a major difference in:
- nobody is "buying" the HW for pcap or XEN to t
least
some of them.
** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: dpdk (
** Also affects: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559912
Title:
Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally
As an example what I meant to imply here the reason why it is disabled
by default as of now.
commit ce9b8bb8b99877026fcca00fdb253fa3ec3a7e06
Author: Thomas Monjalon
Date: Tue Jul 28 18:22:39 2015 +0200
config: disable bnx2x driver
This driver has too many issues:
- too big
Hi Thiago,
you were busy weren't you :-)
Thanks your further experiments and reports - I'll try to refer all the open
points.
Trying to summarize:
1. The vfio grouping issue is not a bug, just the vfio setup being more complex
in general. But you already handled that for your setup - great.
But
ed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Since I consider the extra PMDs kind of "unsupported" upstream I have to
rate it low for now.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
It was also reported in 1559408 that this also affects BNX2X_PMD
** Description changed:
*as a start same text as my reach for the involved project mailing
lists*
I was trying to replicate a setup that I have working on physical devices
(ixgbe) under kvm since there is a virtio pmd dri
Importance: Critical
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
Status: Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559912
Title:
Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally fai
remaining tr change o - to _ which is wrong,
see bug 1554214.
Both should be fixed, so that in case an admin or experiment unassigned
devices and wants to get back to normal by restarting the script would
not fail.
** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt
ok, code is ready I wait a few days for something else to be wrapped up in one
upload.
*beta release hanging over me*
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557532
Title:
dpd
I have working code, but found various other combinations - like if one
pages size isn't supported at all - that I have to take care of first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
It seems we have to decide if we want to hardcode a directory path for
the non-default mountpoint or if we want to replicate dpdks logic to
parse and detect (including size recalculations).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed t
The detection failure was a false positive.
The following would provide a sufficient mount point.
sudo mount -thugetlbfs hugetlbfs /dev/hugepages-1G -o "pagesize=1G"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https
Check code
opens /proc/mounts
gets pagesz_str defining what the mountpoint has
if nothing is set assume default size
if something is set in the mp's options calculate the size
check if this is the mountpoint matching
=> not working for my mountpoint
Need to be run in gdb, to check where exactly it
script, but actually even when mounting a
1G mountpoint it fails.
It needs to be debugged in what way it expects a non-default size hugepage
mount and then provided by dpdk init scripts OR fixed in dpdk code.
** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt
Public bug reported:
In System z one often has plenty of devices in the channel subsystem but
only a few of them configured.
Currently
/etc/sysconfig/scripts/hardware/hwup
/etc/sysconfig/scripts/hardware/functions
Print a log message like this:
Mär 14 09:30:43 s1lp5 systemd-udevd[1169]: Process
** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516543
Title:
dpdk-init depends on executables i
It has to be noted that the steps-to-reproduce have other issues to
build the l2fwd as-is, but the issue addressed with this bug is indeed
fixed.
** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I still expected smb to do this, so I missed that - sorry.
Verifying:
1. verified the issue before proposed
2. updated to proposed
3. I see the critical calls removed in the init script
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dp
I still expected smb to do this, so I missed that - sorry.
Verifying:
1. verified the issue before proposed
2. updated to proposed
3. I see the mk missing issues gone:
e.g. those appear no more:
Makefile:39: /usr/share/dpdk/mk/rte.vars.mk: No such file or directory
Makefile:50: /usr/share/dpdk/mk/r
Hi,
I realized that bug seems dormant :-/
So I wanted to let you know that I keep this unread in my inbox all the
time.
It juts currently buried under other priorities.
But I really intend to take a closer look at a potential SRU as soon as I
can.
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Ser
We looked at it and could confirm that the merge to OVS 2.5 and DPDK 2.2
resolved that bug without us noticing :-/
So mark it properly as fix released.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Relea
FYI - fix is in the queue for review & upload.
This bug should get auto-updated once it gets through.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551767
Title:
DPDK hugepage config in /etc/dpdk/dpdk.conf should pr
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551752
Title:
DPDK Testpmd failing with Xen specific gntalloc in no
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551601
Title:
DPDK init scripts need some hardening against broken
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551796
Title:
DPDK build should avoid using uname -m
To manage not
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554397
Title:
dpdk-init fails due to missing modules in virt enviro
FYI - stalled on FCP setup in RT 89162
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mult
The root cause is very easy - the "-" to "_" conversion in the scripts.
I'll have to discuss why that was added as it is from before my time.
I'll let you know about a solution.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in U
Hi - here a minor update
Regarding:
NOTE: To make it work manually, the module "vfio-pci" must be declared at
"/etc/modules" as well.
Yes it is required to load the module before dpdk_nic_bind, if running manually
you have to do it some way on your own e.g. /etc/modules.
If using the init scrip
Found an uploader, wrapping two more fixes before that.
Therefore removing the debdiff and sponsors subscription from this bug for now.
** Patch removed: "Updated revision of the debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1551601/+attachment/4591564/+files/dpdk_2.2.0-0ubuntu3
Had a discussion with James Page today.
He will look into it (backporting, hack, other solution) in his work regarding
charming that stuff.
Big thanks for that!
We agreed that will discuss (or be happy about the fix) again in approx
10 days from now.
** Changed in: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu)
FYI how it looks like in the log, for the next that might find it.
systemd[1]: Starting DPDK runtime environment...
dpdk-init[7467]: Reassigning pci::00:04.0 to uio_pci_generic
dpdk-init[7467]: Error - no supported modules(DPDK driver) are loaded
systemd[1]: dpdk.service: Main process exited,
it
instead of failing
3. add a comment about the need into /etc/dpdk/interfaces so people can read it
while configuring instead when failing
** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
=> Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https:/
Hi Thiago,
when running into the issue the bug is referring to it looked way different.
So I'd say the issue you are currently facing has nothing to do with the bug.
I've seen your mail on the List and will reply there with some
suggestions and by that keep the bug to the related things.
--
You
Yeah we changed the dpdk piece to properly be linkable in bug 1547517.
And James did some great work on updating openvswitch to 2.5.
We just have forgot to update this one, I'll talk to James later if he agrees
that we can close it.
Thanks already Thiago for making me aware!
--
You received thi
** Patch added: "Updated revision of the debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1551601/+attachment/4591564/+files/dpdk_2.2.0-0ubuntu3-to-2.2.0-0ubuntu4.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to d
Since there was no update yet I wrapped in another minor enhancement that is
tied directly with this LP Bug.
Git repository is updated as well.
** Patch removed: "upload for 2.2.0-0ubuntu4 fixing LP: #1551601, #1551767,
#1551796, #1551752"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/
One of the patches got an ack upstream, the other is still waiting for
attention.
None is committed yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554009
Title:
use after free a
the upstream discussion to finish and apply.
Then we will pick and apply those as backport patches in packaging.
** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Tria
And another FYI it also got into main via
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1492186
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423649
Title:
DPDK port on Ubuntu
Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-16.04
--
Discussion slowed down and patch series grew - still not committed.
=> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openvswitch.org/msg57821.html
The way the discussion went this included more and more of the change from
commandline to ovsdb config for dpdk.
That makes it uncertain if it will get into branch
dpdk (2.2.0-0ubuntu4) xenial; urgency=medium
* harden d/dpdk-init for configuration issues (LP: #1551601):
- detect and warn about bad bus specifications
- detect and warn about incomplete device specifications
- detect and warn about non existing pci IDs
- d/t/test-initscrip
Changes would be ready for upload now.
I'll attach a debdiff dpdk_2.2.0-0ubuntu3-to-2.2.0-0ubuntu4.debdiff
But for much easier review change by change I would recommend
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/dpdk/?h=ubuntu-xenial-to-dpdk2.2
The respective content of this upload is from tag "deb
Discussion seems to be slow, we will integrate the suggested fix until
upstream agreed on a final one and then convert our delta to the
upstream accepted solution.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://
Patch suggestion and upstream discussion =>
http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10954/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551752
Title:
DPDK Testpmd failing with Xen s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1539775 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1539775
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.
DPDK (actually openvswitch-dpdk) related issue is solved - tests are now
detecting a lack of the feature and skip gracefully.
There were other bugs to track it, so removing the incoomplete DPDK bug
association from this bug.
This issue didn't get much updates recently as for now most discussion
I looked into it and while DEB_BUILD_ARCH doesn't match uname -m the
usage of something like the following should be appropriate.
DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU)
... $(DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU)
I'm currently wrapping up several fixes where I can integrate this minor
pa
Public bug reported:
I was made aware (thanks Ferseiti on IRC) that our d/rules file should not use
uname -m.
It was suggested to use DEB_BUILD_ARCH
** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low
Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
