On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:33:25PM -, Peter Petrakis wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the cookie feature you mentioned, but we appear to have
> some of the
> capability here. I haven't compared it to upstream yet.
The code issuing the removal ioctl specfies a cookie (a semaphore with a
positiv
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:29:11PM -, Peter Petrakis wrote:
> In examining the ioctl interface to device mapper (kernel), I have not found
> any architecture that
> assures that when a device mapper device has been marked for deletion, that
> this information is
> relayed back to userspace so
I don't follow this. Your title mentions 'dmsetup' but your description only
talks about multipathd. What is the problem here? One of the multipath
commands in your loop failing to wait until the associated udev action has
completed before exiting? Or some dmsetup command you are running in paral
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:28:45PM -, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> I think this would be legitimate as a bug against lvm for spitting out
> the command_name prefix when --noheadings is specified.
--noheadings only refers only to the headings line.
command_names applies to all output lines.
The op
Dealt with upstream a while back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489398
Title:
Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
