The current version in Quantal is 3.4.1-1, so I am marking this as Fix
Released.
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
[Expired for openldap (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
It's not reproducable, though I have seen it occur on multiple occasions
on different machines. It was occurring when trying to run a euca-bundle
command in the guest this time, which I guess was calling bzip at some
point. Predictably it only occurs when the guest is under any load.
The CentOS ke
Looks like smbd starts before cups. Change "start on" parameter in
/etc/init/smbd.conf to "start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up
and started cups)" solved the problem for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba
Please see the first two questions on
https://answers.launchpad.net/maas/+faqs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015207
Title:
juju setup fails, ERROR Invalid SSH key - 1
Evaluating for SRU to precise since this is a huge missing piece of the
EC2 API
** Also affects: txaws (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: txaws (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Also affects: txaws (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Sta
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017237
Title:
package libpam-smbpass 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed pre-removal script returned er
Public bug reported:
Update manager keeps pointing out that samba has unmet dependencies, so
I decided to remove it. Here is what happens:
$ sudo apt-get remove libpam-smbpass samba
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packa
It does not look like Redhat has done anything with this officially.
Paul is the release manager of Openswan:
http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Paul/Wouters
and provided the patch as a workaround after discovering what he thinks is just
a bug in ipsec-tools (although in an email to me he admits th
** Changed in: nmap (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nmap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739297
Title:
Please update nmap to version 6
To manage notifications about t
Have Red Hat patched their stable release with this fix? I'm wondering
if the patch is a patch that demonstrates the workaround for a bug or is
intended for production code. Has upstream committed a fix?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which i
** Summary changed:
- Please update nmap: stable upstream version is 5.52
+ Please update nmap to version 6
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #674573
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674573
** Changed in: nmap (Debian)
Status: Fix Released => Unknown
** Changed in
I pushed my branch as required. You can find it here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alo21/juju/fix-lp956000/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956000
Title:
'juju bootstrap'
** Branch linked: lp:~alo21/juju/fix-lp956000
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956000
Title:
'juju bootstrap' with no arguments gives confusing message
To manage notific
alo, I'd suggest submitting this as a merge proposal against juju
itself... To do that:
bzr branch lp:juju
cd juju
./test
bzr commit -m 'Useful commit message' --fixes lp:956000
bzr push lp:~alo21/juju/fix-lp95600
bzr lp-propose
It makes no sense for this to land in Ubuntu first with Juju and Ub
fwiw, i'm experimenting atm with a small test runner change/diff to disable
zk fsync
http://paste.ubuntu.com/1057627/
-k
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Hi Martin. These are basically timeouts because each test needs to
> finish in less than 5 seconds. Some of them take 1
Hi Martin. These are basically timeouts because each test needs to
finish in less than 5 seconds. Some of them take 1 - 2 seconds normally,
so if your system gets busy for a second, that can be enough to push a
few of them over 5 seconds.
A few tips:
1) I use sbuild, not pbuilder. If you use the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016886 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016886
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1016886, so is being marked as such.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016886 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016886
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017141
Title:
package winbind 2:3.6.3-2ubunt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016886 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016886
Public bug reported:
Don't work
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: winbind 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic 3.2.18
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic x8
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: juju (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017113
I tested the patch you, Allesandro Losavio, suggested on IRC, and in
that version it's not good, since it makes juju fail to build from
source.
It's worth noting that currently juju also FTBFS in Quantal due to
failing test cases, see Bug #1017113, however, applying this patch makes
it fail earlie
** Attachment added: "juju build log quantal pbuilder-dist"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017113/+attachment/3202385/+files/last_operation.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Public bug reported:
juju on current development version of Ubuntu (quantal) fails to build
from source due to several test cases failing/giving errors.
I've attached the build log.
** Affects: juju (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: ftbfs quantal
--
You receiv
** Package changed: dovecot (Ubuntu) => openssl (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016905
Title
Is there any consensus on what needs to be done here? I'll gladly apply
a patch upstream if there is agreement on what must be done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720071
26 matches
Mail list logo
