[Expired for clamav (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Just got a new Pro in the mail today. I'll check out the sensor issues
as soon as I get it installed.
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Medium
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900447
Title:
Man 5 page for kdc.conf does not mention acceptable encryption
Forgot to mention: the workaround is to cleanrestart the CC (one will
need to stop all running instances).
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undeci
I think this is a known issue in 2.0.x where, under certain conditions,
some IPs are still marked in use. It seems to be triggered by instance
not starting properly (but not only).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyp
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632263
Title:
ProductCode has ambigious import, can cause build failure on
Sorry to revive an old bug, but I've recently run into this problem.
Using the following in smb.conf, when I create a file as a remote user,
the Owner's permissions are always set to executable on files (rwxrw-
rw-), whereas they should be rw-rw-rw-.
[DnD Public]
path = "/mnt/PERSONAL/Dane/RPGs/Dn
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-server-dev/nova/essex
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890362
Title:
Should glance user's shell be /bin/false?
To manage notifications about
Public bug reported:
All openstack components that wish to utilize keystone for identity
management and authentication require python-keystone in order to
configure and use the appropriate middleware. Currently python-keystone
is in universe.
** Affects: glance (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecide
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Milestone: None => 2.0.4
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Assignee: (unassigned) => graziano obertelli (graziano.obertelli)
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided => Me
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Milestone: None => 2.0.4
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to euc
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: Mitch Garnaat (mitch-garnaat) => graziano obertelli
(graziano.obertelli)
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Assignee: (unassigned) => graziano obertelli (graziano.obertelli)
--
lowering priority since Euca 3 will have windows support natively.
Associating this bug to 2.0 series.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Importance: High => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
http
Tim,
Thanks for getting a test version out! I've been swamped the last few
weeks but I can test it out this weekend and post my results. I also
admit I thought this was a VSFTP patch (from Jamie's note) when I
skimmed it the first time, not a new kernel. Oops :)
--
You received this bug notif
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893926
Title:
Contains traces of UEC
To manage notifications abou
thanks for the bug report. Is that still an issue in Ubuntu 11.10 final
?
** No longer affects: kvm (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: unity
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Thomas, i'd argue that any service not using ifup/ifdown, and not
manually calling the /etc/network/if-up.d scripts after bringing
interfaces up is the bug then. NetworkManager has a plugin specifically
to do this, and vmware/virtualbox should too if they're going to manage
interfaces. Of course, i
as part of nova-rootwrap blueprint
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681774
Title:
nova_sudoers i
Bunch of domains impacted, I'm shocked a patch hasn't being issued for
Lucid yet...
Some other domains impacted:
webserver.mta.info
www.energy.alberta.ca
www.baixing.com
www.engineering.utoronto.ca
e.newegg.ca
dns1.name-services.com
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-server-dev/glance/essex
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890362
Title:
Should glance user's shell be /bin/false?
To manage notifications abo
Thanks, Michael - that appears to show that the window size has nothing
to do with it.
At this point, I can only suggest watching 'top' while the benchmark is
running, to see if the cpu is a bottleneck when you are getting the poor
results. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will chime in with
Public bug reported:
This bug is used to keep track of a SRU for openstack, this includes:
* glance_2011.3+git2024-0ubuntu1
* horizon_2012.1~e1-0ubuntu1
* keystone_2011.3.1+git20111205-0ubuntu1
* passlib_1.5.2-1ubuntu1
* nova_2011.3+git2017-0ubuntu1
* swauth_1.0.2+git2028-0ubuntu1
I
>> Where have all my testers gone? This patch isn't going in without some
>> feedback.
Hmm.. Half a year... To Debian I guess
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790863
Ok, my containers do start up again and seem to behave ok. I'm happy to
test this for a more extended period of time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790863
Title:
Una
Where have all my testers gone? This patch isn't going in without some
feedback.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790863
Title:
Unable to start lxc container after upda
On 08/12/11 12:57, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
> Yes, that's right, but there are interfaces not started from
> /etc/network/interfaces or Network Manager:
> * VMware Workstation / Player installs interfaces starting VMware daemons
> * VirtualBox installs interfaces
> * KVM may install an additional b
tps@ivory:~$ ls -l /etc/rcS.d
total 4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447 Jul 14 07:11 README
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 20 00:23 S01apparmor -> ../init.d/apparmor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Oct 20 00:23 S01brltty -> ../init.d/brltty
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Nov 27 21:21 S01etc-setserial ->
../init.d
** Attachment added: "A bit a complicated interfaces file ... :-)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/876458/+attachment/2624512/+files/interfaces
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu
Yes, that's right, but there are interfaces not started from
/etc/network/interfaces or Network Manager:
* VMware Workstation / Player installs interfaces starting VMware daemons
* VirtualBox installs interfaces
* KVM may install an additional bridge
* some VPN software installs tun/tap interfaces
30 matches
Mail list logo
