On 12 December 2013 13:17, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:15:41PM -0600, C de-Avillez wrote:
>> Although I am probably hammering a rather cold iron, I still fail to
>> understand why ntp is not installed by default. I would expect precise
>> timekeeping to be something important o
On 25 December 2013 17:51, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> hello,
>
> is the OS available for ARM / MIPS64? i could not find info that either
> 1204LTS or 1404LTS.
> anyone know better, pl advice.
You can check which debian architectures[1] are available for a given
release on launchpad, that is authorita
, then test in emulators / test-systems and deploy. For
armhf, there are fairly cheap development boards one can use - e.g.
panda board. arm64 stock is very limited and exclusive at this point
in time.
Regards,
Dimitri.
>
> On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 12:35 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
> wrot
On 13 March 2014 15:56, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Jamie Strandboge (ja...@canonical.com):
>>
>> On 03/12/2014 08:52 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Jamie Strandboge (ja...@canonical.com):> Creating a symlink to
>> /usr/bin/qemu-img from /usr/bin/kvm-img makes this error
>> >> go away and
On 6 July 2014 13:34, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to run a central syslog server on ubuntu 14.04. Rsyslog is installed
> and I uncommend the lines
>
> # provides UDP syslog reception
> $ModLoad imudp
> $UDPServerRun 514
>
> Restart rsyslog
> netstat -an |grep 514
>
> dont show a
On 14 August 2014 19:33, Marc Deslauriers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have pushed updated qemu-kvm packages for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and Ubuntu 12.04
> LTS, and qemu packages for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS into the -proposed pocket.
>
Would these also be pushed to cloud archive, when released into -updates?
--
Regard
On 1 April 2015 at 07:34, Ted Cox wrote:
> Hi. New volunteer here.
>
> I made some edits to the introduction.xml document.
>
> I tried to push those edits to my Launchpad account:
>
> bzr push lp:~ted-m-cox/serverguide/serverguide-review-7.1
>
> I get this error:
>
> bzr: ERROR: These branches hav
Hello,
On 16 June 2016 at 22:04, Raphael Philipe Mendes da Silva <
rapha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to generate the preseed file from a s390x system with Ubuntu
16.04, as described in:
> https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/installation-guide/s390x/apbs03.html
>
> However I was not able
Hello,
The d-i installer for s390x is built as a netboot one.
The order of preseeds goes as following:
- paramfile aka kernel cmdline
- ./preseed.cfg from the initrd (does not exist by default)
- file= if specified
= networking & network console is setup =
- url= if specified
Potentially we cou
Hello,
On 28 August 2016 at 03:56, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> Guys,
>
> It is impossible to download Ubuntu Cloud Image right now:
>
> http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/releases/16.04/release/ubuntu-16.04-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img
>
> Returns: Forbidden!
>
The url you are using is an odd one...
Hello,
Can we drop ifenslave?
It's functionality is superseeded by iproute2 as far as I understand
and the ifupdown integration is no longer as relevant, as we are about
to default netplan & networkd.
At least, is it ok to drop the ifupdwon dependency from ifenslave?
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
--
but enhances it.
And instead of ifenslave depending on ifupdown, maybe in the new world
order ifupdown should recommend ifenslave.
or since the hooks do not depend on ifenslave they should simply be
moved into the ifupdown package. This would simply things, no?
> Ryan Harper
>
> O
On 25 October 2017 at 17:05, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> Was it dropped in favor of strongswan (can't find openswan on 16.04, used it
> on 14.04)? I've searched the web but can't find anything about it. If it
> was dropped, wondering why? Thank's, don't need a detailed explanation,
> just confirmat
On 25 October 2017 at 22:04, Josh Powers wrote:
> Hi ubuntu-server,
>
> During the last cycle a proposal [1] was sent to the ubuntu-devel list
> around discontinuing the production of an i386 image for server and
> desktop live. I do not recall seeing any major objections to removing
> the server
On 25 October 2017 at 23:40, Jeffrey Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Dave Walker wrote:
>> Server actually made this call before Desktop :) ..
>>
>> We tried to drop it back in 12.04.. this was the first release where we
>> tried to introduce wacky stuff on the installer (MAAS etc
functioning and improved server installer.
These and many other improvements are brought to you by Carla Berkers,
Claudio Gomboli, Dimitri John Ledkov, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak, Med,
Michael Hudson-Doyle, Nornort, Ryan Harper, Scott Moser, Seth
Fitzsimmons, and many others.
Download
Hey,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 18:44, Leroy Tennison wrote:
>
> If my DNS servers (running bind 9.10.3 on Ubuntu 16.04) only provide internal
> DNS resolution but forward requests to the Internet DNS infrastructure for
> external names/IP addresses do I need to be concerned about DNS Flag Day this
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 20:04, Leroy Tennison wrote:
>
> The reason I ask is I have a commercial vulnerability scanner reporting
as "fail" a test (for example, CVE-2016-5387)of our systems where
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/ states that a fix has
been released and our current ve
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, 20:29 Leroy Tennison, wrote:
> Thanks for your reply - that's what I was afraid of. It would sure be
> nice if there was a supported solution because drive sizes are going to
> push us to EFI eventually.
>
So, the way to solve that is with EFI drivers. Similar to
https://ef
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, 04:57 Gene Soo, wrote:
> After installing from the following image:
>
> https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/hirsute/release/ubuntu-21.04-live-server-arm64.iso
>
Over here URL is listed for ARM64 architecture.
> I was unable to install the package kubuntu-desktop. Please
Hi,
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 6:47 AM Leroy Tennison
wrote:
>
> do-release-upgrade requires the current system have up-to-date patching in
> order to work. I have a client with a number of Ubuntu 16.04 systems, how
> long will those packages be available? If they are going to become
> unavailab
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS has reached the end of standard support.
Please see https://ubuntu.com/blog/18-04-end-of-standard-support about
your options to either upgrade to 20.04 LTS or enable Ubuntu Pro.
Ubuntu Pro offers paid support options that will be able to assist you further.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at
22 matches
Mail list logo