On Friday, December 04 2020, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Paride Legovini wrote on 04/12/2020:
>> 4. Check `docker ps` again. The container will be DOWN.
>> [Focal and Hirsute behave differently here. In Focal the
>> docker service will be down after the reinstall, in
>> Hirsute it goes
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:01:58AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Looking at this briefly.
>
> Is there a pull request for this, such that I could review and comment on
> this implementation?
No, this was just one of several POC's we were considering. Per some of
the other discussion in thi
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:41:15AM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:49 AM Bryce Harrington
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm about to EOD, so in hopes of keeping activity on the bug cross
> > timezones Rick suggested identifying some specific tasks that'd help
>
> Awesome - this is
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:14:37PM -0500, Rick Harding wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:49 PM Bryce Harrington <
> bryce.harring...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> > The question is are there any scenarios where
> > we care about this legacy init system? If there is, then we may need
> > further logic
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:14 PM Rick Harding
wrote:
> This third item I'm not sure how we're going to get around, or if we
>> even can. There was an idea expressed early on to introduce a new
>> package with the simple purpose of hackily shimming out this
>> `deb-systemd-invoke stop` call from do
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:49 PM Bryce Harrington <
bryce.harring...@canonical.com> wrote:
> The question is are there any scenarios where
> we care about this legacy init system? If there is, then we may need
> further logic beyond what I've included; if there isn't, then can we
> omit the update-
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:47:53PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> One other more philosophical design question you could help answer. The
> debhelper generated stuff provided a chunk of code for handling service
> restart via invoke-rc.d. The question is are there any scenarios where
> we care
Please note that 'upgrade' and 'install' are not valid arguments to a
postinst script, so the code shown there will never be run.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#summary-of-ways-maintainer-scripts-are-called
The argument is always 'configure', and you need to ch
Paride Legovini wrote on 04/12/2020:
4. Check `docker ps` again. The container will be DOWN.
[Focal and Hirsute behave differently here. In Focal the
docker service will be down after the reinstall, in
Hirsute it goes down and then back up automatically.
This is because the Hir
Sergio Durigan Junior wrote on 04/12/2020:
On Thursday, December 03 2020, Bryce Harrington wrote:
Sergio demoed to me what he and Paride discovered while examining
docker.io's prerm file (/var/lib/dpkg/info/docker.io.prer
On Thursday, December 03 2020, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> I'm about to EOD, so in hopes of keeping activity on the bug cross
> timezones Rick suggested identifying some specific tasks that'd help
> move the football down the field on Proposal X.
Thanks for the email, Bryce.
> Sergio:
>
> Thanks a
Hey Christian!
This sounds bad indeed, let's see what Matthew has to say. In the
meantime I have backed it out from both bionic-security and
focal-security. Should we also consider dropping it from -updates?
Cheers,
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:01, Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
>
> I was looking at 16
Hey!
I prefer broken upgrades to get pulled anyway. Besides, packages are
updated by unattended-upgrades in up-to 24 hours, so some users might
have not gotten it yet. And there's also those not using
undattended-upgrades. Let me demote it back to -proposed from -updates
as well.
On Fri, 4 Dec 20
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:49 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
>
> I'm about to EOD, so in hopes of keeping activity on the bug cross
> timezones Rick suggested identifying some specific tasks that'd help
Awesome - this is exactly what I meant on standup and missed the other day.
Thanks!
> move the foo
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:49 AM Lukasz Zemczak
wrote:
>
> Hey Christian!
>
> This sounds bad indeed, let's see what Matthew has to say. In the
> meantime I have backed it out from both bionic-security and
> focal-security.
Thank you
> Should we also consider dropping it from -updates?
Well, comp
I was looking at 16 recently touched bugs. Of these a few needed a comment or
task update but not a lot of work. Worth to mention are two of them.
First we've had "one more" kind of conflicting mysql packages from
third party breaking install/upgrade of the one provided by Ubuntu. I
dupped it onto
16 matches
Mail list logo
