Re: Private bugs

2012-09-04 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hi, as requested on my visit to #ubuntu-bugs I have added the following [1] Please feel free to edit it. Testers just want a quick answer to an issue whereby their bug 'dis-appears'. Thanks, Phill. 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Overview#My_Bug_went_Private On 4 September 2012 23:18, C de-Av

Re: Private bugs

2012-09-04 Thread C de-Avillez
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:16:57 -0500 C de-Avillez wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:35:58 +0100 > Phill Whiteside wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > recently a bug reported by a QA member was marked as a duplicate (no > > harm there), but the 'master' bug was set as 'private'. This meant > > that the pe

Re: Private bugs

2012-09-04 Thread C de-Avillez
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:35:58 +0100 Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi folks, > > recently a bug reported by a QA member was marked as a duplicate (no > harm there), but the 'master' bug was set as 'private'. This meant > that the person who registered it could not access it to view / > update etc. > >

Re: Private bugs

2012-09-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 06:35:58 PM Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi folks, > > recently a bug reported by a QA member was marked as a duplicate (no harm > there), but the 'master' bug was set as 'private'. This meant that the > person who registered it could not access it to view / update etc.

Re: Private bugs

2012-09-04 Thread Nio Wiklund
On 2012-09-04 19:35, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi folks, > > recently a bug reported by a QA member was marked as a duplicate (no harm > there), but the 'master' bug was set as 'private'. This meant that the > person who registered it could not access it to view / update etc. > > I had a chat with