I use LibreOffice a lot - particularly Write; if I can be of help there
please let me know.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Chris, yes you should still file them locally. If the issue is an
> upstream one (and not ubuntu specific), the bu
Chris, yes you should still file them locally. If the issue is an
upstream one (and not ubuntu specific), the bug should get upstreamed.
You may be asked to do this, or you can do this yourself if you wish by
opening a bug upstream and linking it to the lp bug. However, it's
important to report bug
I checked this morning (Vancouver time) and this problem has already been
reported in Precise, so I added myself to the bug and also a few details.
Any comment on my other question with regard to testing LibreOffice - bug
reports in Launchpad or upstream?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Nicholas
Agreed. Use ubuntu-bug packagename and file a bug with any weirdness you
see, as part of testing the beta or not :-) Thanks for testing!
Nicholas
On 03/05/2012 03:14 AM, Brendan Donegan wrote:
> On 04/03/12 23:28, chris hermansen wrote:
>> Two questions about beta testing:
>>
>> 1. I have foun
On 04/03/12 23:28, chris hermansen wrote:
Two questions about beta testing:
1. I have found a bug outside the checkbox series; after I have
entered my password on the nice new login screen, and just before
the gray screen comes up as we proceed into unity 2-d, I briefly
see a scramb
Two questions about beta testing:
1. I have found a bug outside the checkbox series; after I have entered
my password on the nice new login screen, and just before the gray screen
comes up as we proceed into unity 2-d, I briefly see a scrambled version of
the login screen with bits of
Beta1 is out! The ppa containing checkbox and some tests is available.
Download the iso, load the ppa and give testing a whirl! Thanks everyone
who contributed to the tests, and thanks in advance for testing.
http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/03/opportunity-manual-application-testing.html
Hap
Thanks Dave -- if you don't otherwise get a request in (it can be really
basic, there's a job for software center already ;-) ), I will try and
get a test written around these lines. If we don't have this for beta1,
that's ok. Beta2 should offer a much more full set of tests -- they'll
just continu
On 29/02/12 11:37, Dave Morley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/12 19:20, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
For those of you who haven't seen/heard, we are planning on testing
our default applications using checkbox for beta1. See this blog
post for more details and submit som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/12 19:20, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> For those of you who haven't seen/heard, we are planning on testing
> our default applications using checkbox for beta1. See this blog
> post for more details and submit some merge requests for tests :-)
> Or
On 29/02/12 11:29, Brendan Donegan wrote:
On 28/02/12 19:20, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
For those of you who haven't seen/heard, we are planning on testing
our default applications using checkbox for beta1. See this blog post
for more details and submit some merge requests for tests :-) Or plan
on
On 28/02/12 19:20, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
For those of you who haven't seen/heard, we are planning on testing
our default applications using checkbox for beta1. See this blog post
for more details and submit some merge requests for tests :-) Or plan
on participating and running the tests via ch
12 matches
Mail list logo
