Akhila, yep note the bug number and place it in the bug list. If you
continue to see the bug over many builds, consider mentioning it here to
raise the visibility of the bug (assuming it's of a critical nature).
Has your bug been confirmed?
Nicholas
On 08/29/2012 10:21 AM, D Akhila Hegde wro
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:30, James Gifford wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Lubuntu is an "official" port, starting this cycle. More on that here[1].
>
> Cheers,
> James Gifford
> http://jamesrgifford.com
>
> [1] http://lubuntu.net/blog/lubuntu-track-official-status-ubuntu-flavour
> [1]
> http://www.omgubuntu
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, James Gifford wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Lubuntu is an "official" port, starting this cycle. More on that here[1].
>
I was wondering when Lubuntu would finally earn official status from
Canonical. I've been using it for a while in VirtualBox. Its rather
stable and runs ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:11:02 +0100
Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi, QA,
>
> A couple of people have stated that Lubuntu is not 'really' on the ISO
> testing area, one simple example would be http://qa.ubuntu.com/ which does
> not even list xubuntu?
>
T
Jeff,
Lubuntu is an "official" port, starting this cycle. More on that here[1].
Cheers,
James Gifford
http://jamesrgifford.com
[1] http://lubuntu.net/blog/lubuntu-track-official-status-ubuntu-flavour
[1]
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/05/lubuntu-made-official-ubuntu-derivative/
On 08/12/2011
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:11, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi, QA,
> A couple of people have stated that Lubuntu is not 'really' on the ISO
> testing area, one simple example would be http://qa.ubuntu.com/ which does
> not even list xubuntu?
That's because, I believe, that Lubuntu is not an "officia
