I agree with the original poster that the current lifecycle model is too
strict (if I have even understood it correctly by the various descriptions
in this mailing list).
I do understand the need to control running applications in devices running
on battery. But still, the current approach seems t
Qt.labs.folderlistmodel is not the same thing, but if your needs are
relatively simple it should work for you with little changes to QML.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Sergio Schvezov <
> sergio.schve...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> On
Hi,
the latest image does not seem to work with the emulator
I just created a new image for the emulator and then ran it with these
commands:
sudo ubuntu-emulator create myinstance
ubuntu-emulator run myinstance
When the image is booted, I get the normal lock screen and tutorial. But
after that
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:34 PM, ajalkane wrote:
> I used "adb shell".
>
> I tried as root and as "phablet" user. Did a "su phablet" from the root
> prompt to get to phablet user.
>
> This is the state after rebooting where the emulator doesn'
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Michał Sawicz
wrote:
> On 30.04.2014 22:34, ajalkane wrote:
> > I used "adb shell".
> >
> > I tried as root and as "phablet" user. Did a "su phablet" from the root
> > prompt to get to phablet user.
>
&
Hi,
For .mov files, File Manager shows all applications that have been
registered with Content-Hub as capable of opening "Videos". So it seems for
some reason media-player is not registered there in your system.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Diogo Figueira
wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Today, when i
updates
> because befora i even watched .mp4 files on my nexus 4
>
> 2014-11-25 17:06 GMT+00:00 ajalkane :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For .mov files, File Manager shows all applications that have been
>> registered with Content-Hub as capable of opening "Videos&quo
I'm sad because I always was huge fan of Ubuntu Phone's dedication to open
source. I'm not surprised because they were (in my opinion unnecessarily)
doing too much and going too much against the grain considering where rest
of Linux ecosystem was headed, and it was clear that this kind of approach
Actually, I have to add that not withstanding Ubuntu Phone, I am personally
affected because I actually like Unity.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:15 PM, ajalkane wrote:
> I'm sad because I always was huge fan of Ubuntu Phone's dedication to open
> source. I'm not surprised bec
My experience is that pure QML/JS solution is suitable to only quite simple
applications. I have myself found the best practice to be to do the UI part
in QML/JS, and have the "business logic" and models in C++. In fact, for
portability between platforms I think doing as little as possible in QML i
ck
> to QML/JS then you can test your code on your Ubuntu desktop and the same
> code will just work the same way on Ubuntu phone. I think it is a
> significant benefit.
>
> Zoltan
>
>
>
>
> On 02/13/2013 05:46 PM, ajalkane wrote:
>
> My experience is that pure QML
I might port ProfileMatic, which is similar to what you describe, to Ubuntu
Phone if the platform features allows it (
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=79642)
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:09 PM, M wrote:
> I use the ProfileManager Lama really much.
>
> It mute my phone if i am in a meeting. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
