On 13-07-18 11:04 AM, Iain Lane wrote:
> Thoughts? I'd like to get moving on being able to define schemas and
> start making the system-settings application set and retrieve keys so
> that app (and system) developers are able to start respecting them.
FYI, App developers will not be able to use GS
Hi,
While discussion the click packages manifest, and the possibility of supporting
multiple binaries inside the same click package in the future, I was wondering
if we had an API where one application can spawn another.
For example, to allow AppXYZ to spawn the browser pointed to a website, to s
On 13-07-18 12:02 PM, John McAleely wrote:
> On 18/07/13 16:29, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> FYI, App developers will not be able to use GSettings in the current version
>> of
>> the SDK because of application confinement.
>>
>> Although we do have a solution for
On 13-07-18 12:12 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 18/07/2013 17:29, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
>> FYI, App developers will not be able to use GSettings in the current version
>> of
>> the SDK because of application confinement.
>
> Hey Marc,
>
> The specific
On 13-07-18 01:00 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 11:14 AM, Michał Sawicz wrote:
>> W dniu 18.07.2013 17:38, Marc Deslauriers pisze:
>>> For the browser, I imagine a URL handler will take care of it, but what
>>> about
>>> spawning a different
On 13-07-19 02:54 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 06:29 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> On 13-07-18 11:04 AM, Iain Lane wrote:
>>> Thoughts? I'd like to get moving on being able to define schemas and
>>> start making the system-settings application set a
On 13-07-19 07:11 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote:
> On Thursday 18 July 2013 20:50:28 Michał Sawicz wrote:
>> W dniu 18.07.2013 20:37, Thomas Voß pisze:
>>> Good point and I do agree in general, However, once we allow mime-type
>>> handling we break the strict per-app siloing of content.
>>>
>>> Not sur
ell? =)
You can do it, but it will be restricted to the same confinement, which is
likely not what you want.
Marc.
>
>
> 19.07.13 16:04 Marc Deslauriers написал(а):
>
> On 13-07-19 07:11 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 July 2013 20:50:28 Michał Sawicz w
On 13-07-19 08:57 AM, David Planella wrote:
> Al 18/07/13 18:32, En/na Marc Deslauriers ha escrit:
>> On 13-07-18 12:12 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>>> Le 18/07/2013 17:29, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
>>>> FYI, App developers will not be able to use GSettings i
ssible for security reasons.
Marc.
--
Marc Deslauriers
Ubuntu Security Engineer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
Canonical Ltd. | http://www.canonical.com/
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launc
a trusted
application. Applications in the store won't be allowed to take screenshots for
security reasons.
Marc.
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Marc Deslauriers
> wrote:
>> On 13-09-29 06:28 AM, James Mugford wrote:
>>> Wow, as easy as that?
>>>
>
On 13-10-25 06:43 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote:
>> In short, your use case falls into the category of 'backup software' and
>> backup software is not supported by the appstore at this time.
>
>
> Just to add some more unsupported use cases:
>
> * A Music downloader
That's supported with the "musi
On 13-10-25 08:20 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote:
> On Friday 25 October 2013 08:13:20 Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> On 13-10-25 06:43 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> In short, your use case falls into the category of 'backup software' and
>>>&
On 13-10-30 11:58 AM, Omer Akram wrote:
> I think this is something that should be looked into, this cycle. We really
> nned
> faster startup for apps :)
>
What impact does this have on ASLR?
Marc.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchp
Hi all,
I upgraded my phone to the trusty image today using phablet-tools, but got hit
with a bug that resulted in losing all my data. (bye bye pictures!)
Although the best way to do the upgrade was mentioned on the list, I noticed it
too late, so here is the current info so nobody else gets hit
On 13-12-16 07:07 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote:
> Are you implying there are canonical projects not using CMake yet?
>
>
> There are, yes. Off the top of my head:
> - ubuntu-ui-toolkit
> - oxide (not in the archive yet)
>
> There might be more.
>
I've added a work item to switch oxide to CMa
On 13-12-16 08:27 AM, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>>
>>
>> We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app
>> in the store has one published version and that has ubuntu-sdk-13.10
>> defined as the framework in the manifest.json
On 13-12-16 11:05 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 16 December 2013 15:27, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>> On 12/16/2013 07:54 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>> On 16 December 2013 13:27, Martin Albisetti wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope
wrote:
>
>
> We ha
On 14-01-14 05:46 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>> On 01/14/2014 03:11 PM, Chris Wayne wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> So after looking at customizing powerd, I noticed several areas where we
>>> have
>>> device-specific config files living inside d
On 14-01-15 01:43 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Marc Deslauriers
> wrote:
>> On 14-01-14 05:46 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
>>>
>>> Speaking with Steve Langasek yesterday, I got strong guidance that all
>>> per-device configs really ne
On 14-01-30 10:20 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
>
> by trusty release we plan to have all shipped packages on the phone in
> main and fully supported, to get to this we will need a ton of Main
> Inclusion Requests to be processed ... given the MIR team is really
> small i think it is time to slo
On 14-01-30 10:52 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Marc Deslauriers
> wrote:
>> On 14-01-30 10:20 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>>> libavcodec54
>>> libavformat54
>>> libavutil52
>>> libdvdnav4
>>> libdvdread4
>&g
On 14-02-12 07:10 AM, Iain Lane wrote:
> [ Dropped Sergio and Colin from CC ]
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:56:05PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> On 11 February 2014 14:57, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
>>> wrote:
On 14-02-12 09:33 AM, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 07:28:46AM -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> On 14-02-12 07:10 AM, Iain Lane wrote:
>> […]
>> They need to be in a separate _source_ package so all the build dependencies
>> still don't get pulled in
On 14-03-06 12:19 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> That's a topic that has been discussed between different groups of people
> recently, on merge requests [1] and bug reports, and it feels like we should
> have the discussion on a common place/together, to decide what is best, and
On 14-03-06 12:19 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> That's a topic that has been discussed between different groups of people
> recently, on merge requests [1] and bug reports, and it feels like we should
> have the discussion on a common place/together, to decide what is best, and
On 14-03-06 01:08 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 06/03/2014 19:02, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
>> Wouldn't a better design be to have the lock screen in the user's session?
>> That
>> way each user can have their own lock screen, and it can access the user
On 14-03-06 01:16 PM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
>> 2. get lightdm to connect to the user-session bus and send back selected
>> informations to the greeter.
>>
>> That seems like the most flexible/powerful solution, giving access to
>> the user session might be a concern for security though.
>
> In a s
On 14-03-06 01:06 PM, Thomas Voß wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Marc Deslauriers
> wrote:
>> On 14-03-06 12:19 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> That's a topic that has been discussed between different groups of people
On 14-06-18 10:33 AM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 14:39 +0100, John Lenton wrote:
>> On 18 June 2014 14:27, Ondrej Kubik wrote:
>>> Idea is to protect from using side load to update existing application with
>>> intruder's version to gain access to application private data or phone
On 14-06-25 11:02 AM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 09:12 +0200, Thomas Voß wrote:
>>> IRC and messaging platforms not covered by "Online Accounts"
>>
>> Push notifications FTW, they provide an easy and straightforward way
>> out of the lifecycle trap.
>
> Push notifications are tota
On 14-06-25 12:21 PM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> Am 25.06.2014 17:21, schrieb Marc Deslauriers:
>> On 14-06-25 11:02 AM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 09:12 +0200, Thomas Voß wrote:
>>>>> IRC and messaging platforms not covered by "Online Accou
On 14-06-25 01:00 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 11:21 -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> It most certainly matters. The amount of applications in the Android store
>> that
>> were created _specifically_ to generate revenue from user tracking is
>
On 14-06-25 01:20 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 11:47 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> On 14-06-25 12:21 PM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
>>> Am 25.06.2014 17:21, schrieb Marc Deslauriers:
>>>> On 14-06-25 11:02 AM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
>>>>>
On 14-06-25 02:11 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 13:23 -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> So I gather you have the same problem on iOS, as much of the same limitations
>> exist there?
>
> I don't now, nor have I ever, owned any iOS devices. Nor have I
>
On 14-06-25 03:29 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 14:44 -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> On 14-06-25 02:11 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 13:23 -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>>>> So I gather you have the same probl
On 14-07-07 04:45 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> with RTM approaching quickly we are working on the developer mode to
>> make it act in a more secure manner. the following changes were
>> discussed with the security team and will be
On 14-07-07 06:43 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> 3) on request of the security team it should not be possible to enable
> adb access if there is no password or the default password set for the
> phablet user so that there is no predictable sudo password that is
> identical on all devices. there are st
On 14-07-07 06:14 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:47:38PM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>>>> 4) you will be able to switch developer mode on/off in the
>>>> system-settings in a sub page of the "about this device"
On 14-07-07 07:09 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:20:56AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>
Sure, you enable a password/PIN on the lock screen.
>
>>> I may be misunderstanding; does this imply that one must enable
>>> password-based unlock on the screen in order to have p
On 14-07-08 01:03 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Marc Deslauriers [2014-07-07 17:34 -0400]:
>> We also asked that adb refuse connections if the screen is locked. Is this
>> implemented?
>
> All the other bits (requiring changing of password etc.) already make
> it rather hard f
On 14-07-08 04:36 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Montag, den 07.07.2014, 17:34 -0400 schrieb Marc Deslauriers:
>> On 14-07-07 06:43 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>>> 3) on request of the security team it should not be possible to enable
>>> adb access if there
On 14-07-08 04:36 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Montag, den 07.07.2014, 17:34 -0400 schrieb Marc Deslauriers:
>> On 14-07-07 06:43 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>>> 3) on request of the security team it should not be possible to enable
>>> adb access if there
On 14-08-04 07:42 AM, David Planella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent landing of the developer mode UI and from previous discussions
> on the list and on IRC, I understand that:
>
> - ADB will be disabled by default, but can be enabled/disabled using the
> switch
> in the developer mode
> -
On 14-08-04 07:52 AM, David Planella wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Marc Deslauriers
> <mailto:marc.deslauri...@canonical.com>> wrote:
>
> On 14-08-04 07:42 AM, David Planella wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With the recent landing of
On 14-08-04 07:55 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> On 14-08-04 07:52 AM, David Planella wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Marc Deslauriers
>> > <mailto:marc.deslauri...@canonical.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 14-08-04 07:42 AM, David Planella wrote:
>
On 2014-11-12 11:58 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> Pulling into CC various stakeholders.
>
> On 11/12/2014 09:47 AM, Florian Boucault wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
> Hi!
>
>> The camera and the gallery app today are authorized to read/write in
>> /home/$USER/Pictures and /home/$USER/Videos.
>> Soon they
On 2014-11-13 12:08 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 08:25 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> On 2014-11-12 11:58 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>>> Pulling into CC various stakeholders.
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2014 09:47 AM, Florian Boucault wrote:
>
>
On 2014-11-13 02:08 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 12:32 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>> On 2014-11-13 12:08 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2014 08:25 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>>>> On 2014-11-12 11:58 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On 2015-02-01 02:35 PM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been banging my head against this for quite a few hours and am getting
> nowhere, so maybe someone out there can help: Sometime in the past few months,
> Beru [1] has lost the ability to be run from within Qt Creator. When I hi
On 2015-04-10 06:15 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there is a somewhat sparsely documented feature of webapps that allow you to
> specify --webappModelSearchPath=. as a parameter of webapp-container in the
> .desktop file and have a file called webapp-properties.json in the project.
> This
>
On 2015-05-20 11:04 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Iain,
>
> Iain Lane [2015-05-20 15:19 +0100]:
>> We sometimes come across bugs where software expects to be able to
>> rename files to work properly (either to atomically update, or perhaps
>> to disable some functionality). This doesn't work with
On 2015-06-10 11:34 AM, Jason DeRose wrote:
> I noticed a (seemingly) related build failure over the weekend:
>
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208521008/buildlog_ubuntu-wily-amd64.degu_0.14.0~alpha~bzr339~ubuntu15.10.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
>
> As this is a failure (seemingly) caused by an independen
On 2015-07-29 10:26 AM, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 11:25 +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>> On 07/29/2015 07:07 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> > This stage is not sufficient since there is no exec() performed
>> > here. This removes the possibility of per-process address space
>> > layout r
I'm trying to install the SDK, as detailed here:
http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
But, I'm hitting the following on Raring:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ubuntu-sdk : Depends: qt-components-ubuntu-examples but it is not going
to be installed
E: Unable to corre
Hi,
On 13-03-18 08:50 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> Hi all!
> I'd like to discuss about our plans for a password/secret storage
> service which could be used by applications to store and retrieve secret
> data.
>
> On the desktop, we are currently using the GNOME keyring, which we
> cannot use
On 13-03-19 03:22 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 03/18/2013 05:01 PM, Bruno Girin wrote:
>> Not all devices will have a SIM, tablets in particular may not. And
>> looking forward to 14.04, I assume we'd want this code to be re-usable
>> on the desktop (or server even)?
>
> Might be a good idea,
On 13-03-19 09:31 AM, Robert Bruce Park wrote:
> On 13-03-19 05:57 AM, Bruno Girin wrote:
>> On 19/03/13 10:01, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>>> Yes. In fact, it's possible to make the two passwords go out of
>>> sync, and there you'll be prompted to enter your keyring master
>>> password as the first a
58 matches
Mail list logo
