Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Default devel channel

2014-11-26 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014, 23:17 -0300 schrieb Sergio Schvezov: > I just noticed that > ubuntu-touch/devel (alias to ubuntu-touch/utopic) > > > Can we change that to vivid already? i'll call this the most asked question for the last three weeks :P we can only switch to a new channel once

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Default devel channel

2014-11-26 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014, 23:17 -0300 schrieb Sergio Schvezov: > > I just noticed that > > ubuntu-touch/devel (alias to ubuntu-touch/utopic) > > > > > > Can we change that to vivid already? > > i'll call this the most asked questio

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Default devel channel

2014-11-26 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2014, 09:10 -0300 schrieb Sergio Schvezov: > > Well a bit more than a month in, when I say I want devel, I want > devel; if it doesn't exist yet, I'd rather have it fail to flash than > get something that it is not even if it once was :-) don't forget that we have act

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Default devel channel

2014-11-26 Thread Niklas Wenzel
Hi, I'm wondering whether we will be able to install devel images on commercial Ubuntu phones (independently from the phone model) once they are available. Any information you could give on this topic? Cheers, Niklas Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 schrieb Oliver Grawert : > hi, > > Am Mittwoch,

[Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 26.11.14

2014-11-26 Thread Ɓukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
9 14.09/krillin - http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/landing-team/ubuntu-rtm/169.commitlog * Smoke-testing results: ubuntu : http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch/ ubuntu-rtm : http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch_stable/ #33 vivid/mako - http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/vivid/touch/m

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Call for Testing: Unity8 Full Shell Rotation

2014-11-26 Thread Selene Scriven
* Kevin Gunn wrote: > Recently the Unity UI team has put in effort around "full shell > rotation". I'm very happy to hear that. I suspect it will improve the UI considerably, and eliminate a lot of app-specific weirdness related to rotation. The new method/policy seems like it will "just wo