Re: [Ubuntu-phone] preferred test framework for C++ backends?

2014-08-09 Thread Michael Zanetti
Hi On Friday 08 August 2014 15:42:57 Alex Chiang wrote: > > Are there any that use QtTest? lp:unity8 and related backend repos use quite a lot of QtTest. Check out the tests/plugins directory. I think I've also seen some QtTest tests in some of the apps. > > TBH, the two frameworks seem fair

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] preferred test framework for C++ backends?

2014-08-09 Thread Carlos J. Mazieri
On Saturday 09 August 2014 13:58:37 Michael Zanetti wrote: > Hi > > On Friday 08 August 2014 15:42:57 Alex Chiang wrote: > > Are there any that use QtTest? > > lp:unity8 and related backend repos use quite a lot of QtTest. Check out the > tests/plugins directory. > > I think I've also seen some

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 08.08.14

2014-08-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Łukasz, On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 12:21:56AM +0200, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: > Hello everyone! > Image promotion! Yes! After a very hard and tiring battle (really), we > were finally able to get rid of all the most serious blockers and pass > the dogfooding criteria. Image #179 will most

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 08.08.14

2014-08-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 08:15:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 12:21:56AM +0200, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: > > #179 > > - http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/landing-team/179.commitlog > > Since the ubuntu-rtm archive has been branched from 178 rather than 179, i

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 08.08.14

2014-08-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 9 August 2014 16:15, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Łukasz, > > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 12:21:56AM +0200, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: >> Hello everyone! > >> Image promotion! Yes! After a very hard and tiring battle (really), we >> were finally able to get rid of all the most serious blockers a