Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing app metadata

2014-04-16 Thread MichaƂ Sawicz
On 16.04.2014 04:23, Rodney Dawes wrote: > Does Unity8 support those? Or will it in the future? If long-press on > the launcher is going to open the preview, then the quick list actions > aren't very quick. And I'm not sure we should be bother to parse all > those out and add custom actions to the

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Michal Hruby
On 16/04/14 06:29, Martin Pitt wrote: David Planella [2014-04-15 17:20 +0200]: - Create a cmake rule to generate the .pot file, based on [3] and add another rule that calls intltool-merge to put the translations into the final .ini file at build time For scopes in click apps this seems fine to

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing app metadata

2014-04-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 11:40 +0800, James Henstridge wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Rodney Dawes > wrote: > >> 2) Would inline translations have any effect on the image size > >> compared to having the translations in a .mo? (More specifically for > >> the description bits as the questio

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 07:38 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > It's not all that obvious really. You only pay the extra price for > mmapping the .mo file once, and as soon as your application/scope has > a single human readable string outside of the .ini file you are going > to pay it anyway. And that pri

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 07:29 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > For scopes in the Ubuntu archive I think it would be better to just > reference the translation domain in the .ini file, similar to our > .desktop files. Then they can be covered by langpacks and we wouldn't > need to update all click apps for

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Rodney Dawes [2014-04-16 11:37 -0400]: > No, instead of a simple update to the click, which can be installed from > system settings and only take a few seconds for the user to accomplish, > we'd have to build an entirely new image, and require the user to do a > full system update Why would that b

[Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 16.04.14

2014-04-16 Thread Didier Roche
Hi, Running on the finish line to continue improving ubuntu Touch image quality! Three images were built, and #299 is promoted! Those images contain two critical bugs fixed in since yesterday! We will surely get higher than #300 for the (hopefully) next Touch image which will go to a stable c

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Rodney Dawes [2014-04-16 13:02 -0400]: > > This needs to be measured first. "Orders of magnitude" is certainly a > > big exaggeration; it's an extra mmap() for a single string lookup and > > maybe three extra stat calls. It can surely take a factor of about > > three (of a very short time), so whoe

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 16.04.14

2014-04-16 Thread Sam Bull
On mer, 2014-04-16 at 18:56 +0200, Didier Roche wrote: > Running on the finish line to continue improving ubuntu Touch image > quality! Three images were built, and #299 is promoted! Running #296, it says software is up to date. Is something broken, or am I just a little early? > - fix for activi

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 18:37 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Rodney Dawes [2014-04-16 11:37 -0400]: > > No, instead of a simple update to the click, which can be installed from > > system settings and only take a few seconds for the user to accomplish, > > we'd have to build an entirely new image, and r

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 19:11 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Rodney Dawes [2014-04-16 13:02 -0400]: > > > This needs to be measured first. "Orders of magnitude" is certainly a > > > big exaggeration; it's an extra mmap() for a single string lookup and > > > maybe three extra stat calls. It can surely ta

[Ubuntu-phone] testing help: Qt5.2 gui thread & Mir non-blocking eglswapbuffers

2014-04-16 Thread Kevin Gunn
Hi all, Some of you may have been following the various threads on the "Qt5.2 queuing events when screen is off" bug through any of the following: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1292306 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-37677 https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg07458.html

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Kyle Nitzsche
On 04/16/2014 01:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: >> And the convenience of lang packs would only be for things where we >> > are the upstream (and probably only things that are in the image >> > itself, rather than updated via clicks). > Yes, we agree (that's what I wrote as well). As I said, the langpac

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing scopes

2014-04-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 19:04 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote: > On 04/16/2014 01:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > > And the convenience of lang packs would only be for things where we > > > > are the upstream (and probably only things that are in the image > > > > itself, rather than updated via clicks).

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Internationalizing app metadata

2014-04-16 Thread James Henstridge
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 11:40 +0800, James Henstridge wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Rodney Dawes >> wrote: >> >> 2) Would inline translations have any effect on the image size >> >> compared to having the translations in a .mo? (M