Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Jani Monoses
Hi Dmitry, (adding back the list so others can follow and add more information) The system.img built from the AOSP-like source tree indeed now contains some Ubuntu components but that is ok, those are needed as the glue between Android and the Ubuntu system. And the image that you need to boot is

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Thanks, Jani, I did not realize that I need to use this pre-installed image, maybe you could make it more clear on Porting guide page. Now I see only - Either way, you'll need the Ubuntu preinstalled image besides the one you're going to build with the instructions below. You can find the

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Paul Larson wrote: > It's getting late here, but wanted to give a heads up on some observations > so far for image 13. > > First, ui-toolkit seems to have added quite a few more testcases. This is > always great to see! > > Gallery - new failures: > gallery_app.test

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Jani Monoses
- > Either way, you'll need the Ubuntu preinstalled image besides the one > you're going to build with the instructions below. You can find the Ubuntu > preinstalled images > here > . > > Probably there should be some i

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Should we remove cdimage-[touch,legacy]?

2013-11-06 Thread François Leblanc
Ok this is more clear, for me at least. I understand that cdimage-[touch,legacy] concern only official port maguro, grouper, mako, manta This as nothing to see with daily build trusty-preinstalled-touch-armhf.tar.gz

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Michał Sawicz
On 06.11.2013 09:40, Olivier Tilloy wrote: On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Paul Larson mailto:paul.lar...@canonical.com>> wrote: Those failures are due to the new default behaviour of the toolbar (shown by default, automatically hides after 5 seconds). Previously it was hidden by default, so the

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
One more question. "Manual Download & Installation" section on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Install mentions a saucy-preinstalled-touch-armel+grouper.zip as a second step in this process. In case of my own port, should it become something like cm-10.1-20131101-UNOFFICIAL-tilapia.zip which is gene

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 06.11.2013 09:40, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Paul Larson > > wrote: >> Those failures are due to the new default behaviour of the toolbar >> (shown by default, automatically

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Jani Monoses
Hi you need to download that exact zip from the Ubuntu servers. It is the full Ubuntu userland. the cm-...tilapia.zip is the Android side, same as system.img and boot.img but packaged in a zip for easy update via the recovery image. So the Ubuntu side is prrebuilt for armhf and should be almost ide

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Michał Sawicz
On 06.11.2013 10:43, Olivier Tilloy wrote: Well there is an emulator already, it provides methods such as open_toolbar(), close_toolbar(), and click_button(). I’m not sure how the new default behaviour of the toolbar could be made transparent to test authors through an emulator. Well, calling o

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
I'm sorry Jani, but I'm lost :-) Please correct me if I'm wrong. That "Manual Download & Installation" tells about 3 steps: 1. Flash boot, recovery, system images. I presume these images should contains some phablet code (at least for recovery - support for autodeploy, otherwise next step could fa

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 06.11.2013 10:43, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > >> Well there is an emulator already, it provides methods such as >> open_toolbar(), close_toolbar(), and click_button(). >> I’m not sure how the new default behaviour of the toolbar could be made

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Jani Monoses
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I'm sorry Jani, but I'm lost :-) > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > Sorry, I forgot to say that what I was talking about is the newer (so called flipped-image) method of running Ubuntu, where Android's system.img is inside an LXC containe

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 12:36 +0200 schrieb Jani Monoses: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Dmitry Smirnov > wrote: > I'm sorry Jani, but I'm lost :-) > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > Sorry, I forgot to say that what I was talking about is the newer (s

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Jani Monoses
unflipped will not work anymore, all the super evil hacks it used are > gone from the rootfs since over 6 months, please only use (and > recommend) the flipped method. > > >From the recent thread on this list saying the cdimage-legacy option of phablet-flash is to be kept around I figured that unf

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Tim Peeters
If the toolbar stays in place after open_toolbar(), then we would be testing a toolbar with modified behavior, not the toolbar that you see in the apps. Would the problem be solved if click_button() is changed so that it ensures that the toolbar is opened before clicking? Tim. On Wed, Nov 6, 20

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 12:49 +0200 schrieb Jani Monoses: > unflipped will not work anymore, all the super evil hacks it used are > gone from the rootfs since over 6 months, please only use (and > recommend) the flipped method. > > > > From the recent thread on t

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Ok, thanks for clarifications! I see I need to finish porting phablet changes into recovery to make my life simpler :-) 2013/11/6 Jani Monoses > unflipped will not work anymore, all the super evil hacks it used are > >> gone from the rootfs since over 6 months, please only use (and >> recommen

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Tim Peeters wrote: > If the toolbar stays in place after open_toolbar(), then we would be > testing a toolbar with modified behavior, not the toolbar that you see in > the apps. > > Would the problem be solved if click_button() is changed so that it > ensures that

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Jani Monoses
Hi, while I have not tested it, I had a go at porting the recovery patches ported to AOSP 4.2.2 in the phablet-4.2.2_r1 branch of the main repositories and those may serve as a start for CodeAurora based trees. Jani On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Ok, thanks for clar

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Design] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Olivier Tilloy: > > Those failures are due to the new default behaviour of the toolbar > (shown by default, automatically hides after 5 seconds). do we know who made this decision and if they actually tried to use their phone with this change

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Design] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Tim Peeters
I made the changes, as requested by design. See the description of this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1207369 I'm not sure if everybody can read the design specs that are linked there, but the changes are described in more detail there. I don't know if the

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Porting issues

2013-11-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Thanks for the tip. I'll try to use it. 2013/11/6 Jani Monoses > Hi, > > while I have not tested it, I had a go at porting the recovery patches > ported to AOSP 4.2.2 in the phablet-4.2.2_r1 branch of the main > repositories and those may serve as a start for CodeAurora based trees. > > Jani >

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Design] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread mrqtros
Hi, guys, what with RSS Reader? =) I am one of two developers of Shorts, so you can ask any questions =) BR, Roman. 06.11.13 15:13 Oliver Grawert написал(а): hi, Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Olivier Tilloy: > > Those failures are due to the new default behaviour of the too

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Design] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Sam Bull
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:38 +0100, Tim Peeters wrote: > I made the changes, as requested by design. See the description of > this bug: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1207369 What if it just bounced slightly into view during the transition? Much like when you tap

[Ubuntu-phone] Patches against AOSP 4.2.2_r1

2013-11-06 Thread Jani Monoses
Hello, The phablet/phablet-4.2.2_r1 branches in the phablet repositories are adapted so they apply against a clean AOSP 4.2.2 tree. This is work in progress I am testing with Nexus 4. While it does not yet boot into Unity just into a shell it can help those basing their ports on something closer

[Ubuntu-phone] Working with the CI team

2013-11-06 Thread Evan Dandrea
Hi, You may from time to time need things from the Continuous Integration team. You have a few options: 1) For critical issues needing immediate attention, please continue to ask the vanguard in #ci and #ubuntu-ci-eng. 2) For specific issues or needs from our infrastructure, please file a bug he

[Ubuntu-phone] inside android

2013-11-06 Thread leon lee
Hi, all. I think some of us might be interested in this, so here it is. As experienced android-related developers or just beginners, sometimes you might have questions about what's going on inside android. Such as how activity starts, how service starts, etc. If we look into the code, we might ha

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Paul Larson
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Paul Larson wrote: > >> It's getting late here, but wanted to give a heads up on some >> observations so far for image 13. >> >> First, ui-toolkit seems to have added quite a few more testcases. This is >> alw

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Paul Larson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Olivier Tilloy < > olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Paul Larson wrote: >> >>> It's getting late here, but wanted to give a heads up on some >>> observations so far for imag

[Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Wednesday 6th November

2013-11-06 Thread Didier Roche
Hey guys, *In summary*: please do not merge anything yet to trunk if your component was part of the AP 1.4 transition. crusty details: Images 12 and 13 contains all the releases from yesterday. We got some troubles to get good results, because one of the indicator was going crazy (and the n

[Ubuntu-phone] IMPORTANT: Upgrading phone to trusty image

2013-11-06 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Hi all, I upgraded my phone to the trusty image today using phablet-tools, but got hit with a bug that resulted in losing all my data. (bye bye pictures!) Although the best way to do the upgrade was mentioned on the list, I noticed it too late, so here is the current info so nobody else gets hit

[Ubuntu-phone] New Device

2013-11-06 Thread Lukas Krotovic
Hi, I'd like to build Ubuntu Touch for Samsung Galaxy Wonder (GT-i8150) ancora. Could I add this device to the table of working-in-progress. Thanks for answer. Lukas Krotovic -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https:

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] IMPORTANT: Upgrading phone to trusty image

2013-11-06 Thread Robert Park
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > Do _NOT_ use phablet-flash from the phablet-tools package that is currently in > saucy. Is the trusty version ok? -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https:/

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] IMPORTANT: Upgrading phone to trusty image

2013-11-06 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Robert Park wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Marc Deslauriers > wrote: > > Do _NOT_ use phablet-flash from the phablet-tools package that is > currently in > > saucy. > > > Is the trusty version ok? > Yes it should be (I'm using it). The backup thing was

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing plan - Tuesday 5th November

2013-11-06 Thread Timo Jyrinki
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: Webbrowser: - new failure: webbrowser_app.tests.test_title.TestWindowTitle.test_window_title >>> >>> This one happens only on otto (desktop VM), and we can’t seem to >>> reproduce it locally. >>> For some weird reason, autopilot finds