[Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

Hi, so when I install camera-app-autopilot on trust build #1, I simply get: The following NEW packages will be installed: camera-app-autopilot 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. When I do the same for webbrowser-app-autopilot, I get quite a bunch of things installe

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On 21/10/13 11:37, Alexander Sack wrote: > Hi, > > so when I install camera-app-autopilot on trust build #1, I simply get: > > The following NEW packages will be installed: > camera-app-autopilot > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > > > When I do the same for web

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

Hello! webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot which provides reusable emulators(helpers) to easily interact with different components of the ubuntu-ui-toolkit while writing autopilot tests. The dependencies come from there. Many other apps depend on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autop

[Ubuntu-phone] Ubuntu touch

est ce que ubuntu touch marche sur une tablet sanei N10??? -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

Hi, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram wrote: > Hello! > > webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot which > provides reusable emulators(helpers) to easily interact with different > components of the ubuntu-ui-toolkit while writing autopilot tests. The > dependenci

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram wrote: > Hello! > > webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot which > provides reusable emulators(helpers) to easily interact with different > components of the ubuntu-ui-toolkit while writing autopilot tests. The > dependencies co

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Ubuntu touch

Please, ask your questions in English, France is not the center of the world! S'il vous plaît, posez vos questions en Anglais, la France n'étant pas le centre du monde! Jean-Marc Gailis Jānis-Marks Gailis Thunderbird Translator Latvian Ubuntu Translator Ubuntu Translator Team Mozilla Translator T

[Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

Hi, I'm looking to port my MeeGo / SailfishOS app to Ubuntu Touch. The UI is in QML, but it requires Python. I've been using "PyOtherSide" on SailfishOS successfully. PyOtherSide is a QML Plugin that provides access to a Python interpreter from QML: http://thp.io/2011/pyotherside/ I was wonderi

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Ubuntu touch

Hi, Le 21/10/2013 12:54, hichem chouaibi a écrit : est ce que ubuntu touch marche sur une tablet sanei N10??? N'oubliez pas que cette liste est anglophone ! Please don't forget that this list is english spoken/written ;-) The official device list is there : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Dev

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] lxc start error

On 10/19/2013 03:38 PM, François Leblanc wrote: Hello, I trying to put ubuntu touch n crespo device (Nexus S), I've got error: lxc-start 1382211228.518 ERRORlxc_conf - Script exited with status 1 lxc-start 1382211228.518 ERRORlxc_start - failed to run pre-start hooks for container

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram > wrote: > > Hello! > > webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot which > provides reusable emulators(helpers) to easily intera

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram > > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-au

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

+slangasek On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge > wrote: >> >> On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram > > > wrote:

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > (see > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/trunk/view/head:/tests/autopilot/ubuntuuitoolkit/base.py#L28). H, I wonder why we don't simply say this? glob.glob('/usr/lib/*/qt5/bin/qmlscene') This would

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On 21.10.2013 18:33, Robert Park wrote: H, I wonder why we don't simply say this? glob.glob('/usr/lib/*/qt5/bin/qmlscene') This would work assuming there is only one arch of qmlscene installed on any given test environment. Does the test environment really have multiple arches installe

[Ubuntu-phone] [Development] Port for jfltexx (Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE Intl.)

Hello, I'm currently working on a port for the jfltexx device (Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE), and I currently have a semi-working-ish setup. Questions: * how/where can I find rules/tools/... on which I can validate the things I changed so it won't break stuff * where can I put my results? Hosting files

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

Le 21/10/2013 17:12, Olivier Tilloy a écrit : On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram mailto:omer.ak...@canonical.com>> wrote: Hello! webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ub

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On 10/21/2013 11:55 AM, David Barth wrote: > Le 21/10/2013 17:12, Olivier Tilloy a écrit : >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> >>> On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram >>>

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Development] Port for jfltexx (Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE Intl.)

On 21 October 2013 18:47, Yvan Janssens wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently working on a port for the jfltexx device (Samsung Galaxy S4 > LTE), and I currently have a semi-working-ish setup. > > Questions: > * how/where can I find rules/tools/... on which I can validate the things > I changed so it

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] lxc start error

Thank you Neal. I've copied android-ramdisk to /boot and now step is passed. I've a black screen but it is in progress since I don't fall back to adb... I've not read that android-ramdisk should be put on /boot, perhaps I missed some documentations? Now I need to investigate what happens but at

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

Hi Matt, I can help you to get it working. My nick is rbelem and I'm at #ubuntu-touch channel. BTW, I was wondering if pyotherside can make pyside applications work with qt5. I want to port openwhatsapp[0] to ubuntu touch. [0] http://openwhatsapp.org/develop/ -- Rodrigo Belem On Oct 21, 2013

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy < olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot which >> provides reusable emulators(helpers) to easily interact with dif

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

Hi, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > Do we have any thoughts on how we would go about getting those bits on > the phone once we move to read-only testing? Andy/Sergio/Thomi? > This is part of a more generic problem, that affects more than just the web-browser app. Esse

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

Is there a reason you are trying to use Python from QML instead of it's native Javascript? While PyOtherSide may work, it's not a supported language or platform for the Ubuntu SDK, so we can't guarantee that it will always work or work properly. I would encourage you to use Javascript instead of

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Thomi Richards < thomi.richa...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > >> Do we have any thoughts on how we would go about getting those bits on >> the phone once we move to read-only testing? Andy/Sergio/Thomi? >>

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Sergio Schvezov < sergio.schve...@canonical.com> wrote: > Not everyone is going to Oakland though. So if you want to postpone it, do > it until UDS. Yeah, sorry, I guess I meant that I need to have some conversations in Oakland before I have all the information I

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

On 21.10.2013 21:31, Michael Hall wrote: Is there a reason you are trying to use Python from QML instead of it's native Javascript? While PyOtherSide may work, it's not a supported language or platform for the Ubuntu SDK, so we can't guarantee that it will always work or work properly. I would

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

On 10/21/2013 04:06 PM, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 21.10.2013 21:31, Michael Hall wrote: >> Is there a reason you are trying to use Python from QML instead of it's >> native Javascript? >> >> While PyOtherSide may work, it's not a supported language or platform >> for the Ubuntu SDK, so we can't gua

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On 21.10.2013 21:25, Thomi Richards wrote: 1) Get an overlayFS working on the phone. Any time you want to test something, you start the overlayFS, install your autopilot test suite + deps, run the tests, and then kill the overlayFS afterwards. Nothing touches the base image. I was talking to so

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

On 10/21/2013 03:13 PM, Pat McGowan wrote: > On 10/21/2013 04:06 PM, Michał Sawicz wrote: >> On 21.10.2013 21:31, Michael Hall wrote: >>> Is there a reason you are trying to use Python from QML instead of it's >>> native Javascript? >>> >>> While PyOtherSide may work, it's not a supported language

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

On Oct 21, 2013, at 03:31 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >So, if the app shipped the entire python interpreter we should be able to get >away with not having to update the application confinement policy. > >However, shipping the interpreter is cumbersome, and I think what is really >being asked is if

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

Or Go! http://github.com/niemeyer/qml On Oct 21, 2013 1:06 PM, "Michał Sawicz" wrote: > On 21.10.2013 21:31, Michael Hall wrote: > >> Is there a reason you are trying to use Python from QML instead of it's >> native Javascript? >> >> While PyOtherSide may work, it's not a supported language o

[Ubuntu-phone] TTS

I'm wondering if there has been any discussion of a TTS (text to speech) being implemented on Ubuntu Touch, and if so, where could I find any information. If not, what would be the best place to open an issue for discussion, or who could/should I contact for more info, or to suggest this idea?

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] TTS

On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 15:53 -0500, Israel wrote: > I'm wondering if there has been any discussion of a TTS (text to speech) > being implemented on Ubuntu Touch, and if so, where could I find any > information. If not, what would be the best place to open an issue for > discussion, or who could

[Ubuntu-phone] Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle

Recently someone asked me about adding an apparmor policy group for qtpowerd so that apps could stop application lifecycle from suspending the app. I said to file a bug and I'd look at it because I was thinking this seemed reasonable for a number of reasons (which I'll list below). We were told th

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > I think we may be too strict on this. Consider the following apps: > * a metronome app for musicians to practice to (2 are in the app store now) > * a white noise app to help people sleep (1 in the store) > * a navigation app that speak

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > > Recently someone asked me about adding an apparmor policy group for > qtpowerd so > that apps could stop application lifecycle from suspending the app. I said > to > file a bug and I'd look at it because I was thinking this seemed > reas

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] TTS

I may have been too brief in my initial e-mail. I am looking for something (like festival, espeak, picoTTS, etc...) that takes text and converts it into audio in real time. I have obviously found some (like festival) that are in the 13.10 repos, and work well, and are generally simple. I was m

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

On 22 October 2013 04:39, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Please note too that we don't want to ship Python 2 on the touch images for > 14.04, so if you're going to use Python make sure it's Python 3. > The author of PyOtherSide (thp) only officially supports python 3.3+ (although I believe it is possible

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] PyOtherSide: Asynchronous Python Bindings for Qt 5

On 22 October 2013 02:43, Rodrigo Belem wrote: > I can help you to get it working. My nick is rbelem and I'm at #ubuntu-touch > channel. BTW, I was wondering if pyotherside can make pyside applications > work with qt5. I want to port openwhatsapp[0] to ubuntu touch. Hi Rodrigo, Thanks! I'll loo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle

On 10/21/2013 06:05 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jamie Strandboge I think we may be too strict on this. Consider the following apps: > * a metronome app for musicians to practice to (2 are in the app store > now) > * a white noise app to help people

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] TTS

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:28:47AM EST, Israel wrote: > I may have been too brief in my initial e-mail. > I am looking for something (like festival, espeak, picoTTS, etc...) I started working on some TTS bindings to use the speech-dispatcher framework during saucy. I need to get them finished, ho

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] TTS

On 10/21/2013 07:46 PM, Luke Yelavich wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:28:47AM EST, Israel wrote: I may have been too brief in my initial e-mail. I am looking for something (like festival, espeak, picoTTS, etc...) I started working on some TTS bindings to use the speech-dispatcher framework d

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:05:07PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Olivier Tilloy > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge > > wrote: > >> On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46

[Ubuntu-phone] [UBUNTU PHONE REQUESTS] i9505 (non usa)

Now that ubuntu phone has been officially released? And its more important than ever to get this around as.many devices as possible plus with the great hardware of the samsung galaxy s4 i9505 wouldn't it be a good idea to port ubuntu over ? The S4 has custom roms which include cyanogen mod

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/2013 01:46 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > I think we may be too strict on this. Consider the following apps: > * a metronome app for musicians to practice to (2 are in the app > store now) * a white noise app to help people sleep (1 in the > s

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > > Recently someone asked me about adding an apparmor policy group for qtpowerd > so > that apps could stop application lifecycle from suspending the app. I said to > file a bug and I'd look at it because I was thinking this seemed reason