Stuart Langridge brought up an interesting idea for this on IRC, which
I'm copying here rather than having more side discussions:
(10:13:20) aquarius: ev, just reading your thread about runaway
processes on the touch mailing list (I'm not subscribed to the list,
so there's no good way of replying)
On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> Stuart Langridge brought up an interesting idea for this on IRC, which
> I'm copying here rather than having more side discussions:
>
> (10:13:20) aquarius: ev, just reading your thread about runaway
> processes on the touch mailing list (I'm not subscribed
On 05/09/13 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote:
>> Stuart Langridge brought up an interesting idea for this on IRC, which
>> I'm copying here rather than having more side discussions:
>>
>> (10:13:20) aquarius: ev, just reading your thread about runaway
>> processe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/05/2013 12:28 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't see any shortcuts around the fact that identifying runaway
> processes is going to require manually sifting through reports to
> identify possible problems. I think we should have a very clear
>
On 09/05/2013 12:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 05/09/13 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote:
>>> Stuart Langridge brought up an interesting idea for this on IRC, which
>>> I'm copying here rather than having more side discussions:
[...]
Oops, I should have rea
Hi Michael,
with libusermetrics we have an API for that. Documentation is available
at
http://developer.ubuntu.com/api/devel/ubuntu-13.10/cplusplus/usermetrics/.
HOWEVER, the approach we currently take to generate infographics might
still change post 13.10. So, we don't give any warranty on the A
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:01:37PM +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 09/05/2013 12:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > On 05/09/13 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
> >> On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> >>> Stuart Langridge brought up an interesting idea for this on IRC, which
> >>> I'm copying h
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Joe Talbott wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:01:37PM +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>> On 09/05/2013 12:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> > On 05/09/13 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> >> On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote:
>> >>> Stuart Langridge brought up an i
On 05/09/13 14:39, Thomas Voß wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Joe Talbott wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:01:37PM +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2013 12:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
On 05/09/13 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 05/09/13 14:39, Thomas Voß wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Joe Talbott
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:01:37PM +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 09/05/2013 12:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 05/09/13 10:33,
On 09/05/2013 04:39 PM, Thomas Voß wrote:
> Hmmm, effectively extending the ANR approach to non-UI bits. That is
> interesting idea. Admittedly, an app could work around that, too, but
> hey :) Further extending on the idea: Whenever we identify a process
> that is using too much CPU over a certain
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 11:06:10PM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> TL&DR: If you're just a system-image user and haven't reflashed with
> phablet-flash since Tuesday, you'll want to run "adb shell
> system-image-cli -b 0" to get you to the latest image.
If that command fails,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 11:52:53AM -0400, Tony Espy wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 05:49 AM, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> > In another discussion, James Hunt raised the possibility of
> > periodically checking for runaway processes on Touch, killing those
> > consuming 100% CPU while creating a report to be sent
On 09/05/2013 07:01 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 09/05/2013 12:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> On 05/09/13 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
>>> On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote:
Stuart Langridge brought up an interesting idea for this on IRC, which
I'm copying here rather than having
Hello,
Original post at:
https://www.stgraber.org/2013/09/05/ubuntu-touch-system-images-now-default/)\
After over 3 months of development and experimentation, I’m now glad to
announce that the system images are now the recommended way to deploy
and update the 4 supported Ubuntu Touch devices, ma
On 5 September 2013 18:35, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Is this a proposal for 13.10?
>
> I think it's unrealistic to think anything discussed here would land for
> 13.10. We already have plenty of other things on our plate that are on the
> critical path for 13.10. :)
Agreed :)
> Anyway, point tak
16 matches
Mail list logo
