My understanding was that -rtm was going to be treated like SRUs, you
have to land things in ubuntu before landing them in -rtm. So -rtm
should be just for backporting fixes from ubuntu.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Rodney Dawes
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 17:54 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:55:42PM -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 17:54 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > * Anything else?
>
> Will all landings in ubuntu-rtm also be copied to the ubuntu archive? If
> not, when will the disparity begin, and how will it be managed going
> forward
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 17:54 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> * Anything else?
Will all landings in ubuntu-rtm also be copied to the ubuntu archive? If
not, when will the disparity begin, and how will it be managed going
forward? Will ubuntu stagnate until ubuntu+1 is opened up, and then
we'll dump al
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
wrote:
> We could then simply extend the spreadsheet to include 20 additional
> sheets, each named landing-rtm-001 etc. - no additional philosophy.
Actually I was really hoping that we could move this in the opposite
direction. The spread
Hi Colin!
Thanks for going forward and starting this discussion.
On 15.07.2014 18:54, Colin Watson wrote:
> For the plan to deliver the phone RTM from a derived "ubuntu-rtm"
> distribution, we'll need to use a different set of silo PPAs, since PPAs
> are attached to a particular distribution (whi
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Robert Park wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> if we use the numbers to infer if its stable vs. devel, please make a
>> big buffer (e.g. make all stable silos start with 5XX) so we can grow
>> silos without having to make the schem
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> if we use the numbers to infer if its stable vs. devel, please make a
> big buffer (e.g. make all stable silos start with 5XX) so we can grow
> silos without having to make the scheme more complicated.
Yeah, I was going to say, why not 1XX
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
>>
>> For the plan to deliver the phone RTM from a derived "ubuntu-rtm"
>> distribution, we'll need to use a different set of silo PPAs, since PPAs
>> are attached to a particular dist
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> For the plan to deliver the phone RTM from a derived "ubuntu-rtm"
> distribution, we'll need to use a different set of silo PPAs, since PPAs
> are attached to a particular distribution (which is clearer now that the
> PPA URL format has been
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> For the plan to deliver the phone RTM from a derived "ubuntu-rtm"
> distribution, we'll need to use a different set of silo PPAs, since PPAs
> are attached to a particular distribution (which is clearer now that the
> PPA URL format has been c
10 matches
Mail list logo
