Done.
Thanks, looking forward to a fix.
M
On Friday, 16 September 2016 11:09:43 PM AEST, Reiner Klenk
wrote:
On the M10 (rc), connected to Microsoft or Samsung dongle the latency is
more or less OK (Samsung 4k Monitor). The screen resolution is bad because
the native tablet resolution is tra
Thanks for that. Have tuned the mouse all the way up... better, but still
far from usable as a daily driver. Screen resolution is still pretty awful.
When compared to my Meerkat 76 over hdmi, it's a sloth. Perhaps not a fair
comparison, but that's the kind of functionality needed for a desktop
V2. H. Will try changing router frequency, thanks for the tip!
M
On Friday, 16 September 2016 8:50:34 PM AEST, Pat Wall
wrote:
Hi Mitchell
As a matter of interest, are you using the v1 or v2 Microsoft Display
Adapter? v2 is *supposed* to have much less latency (I'm thinking of
buying on
On the M10 (rc), connected to Microsoft or Samsung dongle the latency is
more or less OK (Samsung 4k Monitor). The screen resolution is bad because
the native tablet resolution is transmitted as a 720p video stream which is
in turn upscaled by the dongle to 1080p. Pls. mark
https://bugs.launchpad.n
v2 is *supposed* to have much less latency
v2 is not yet officialy supported in UT. I was advised to still go with v1.
Although I do remember someone from Canonical saying they were looking at
bringing UT to be v2 compatible. I f I am not mistaken it was Simon Fels.
On my Samsung monitor (21 inch
Hi Mitchell
As a matter of interest, are you using the v1 or v2 Microsoft Display
Adapter? v2 is *supposed* to have much less latency (I'm thinking of
buying one myself for use with the M10). I have read that a lag can
potentially be reduced by setting the wi-fi router to broadcast on a
different
Hi, just got a Microsoft wifi display adapter today, and have been using
it with my Meizu Pro 5. Meh... would love to know what to expect. On my
Samsung monitor (21 inch) it is extremely laggy, with very poor screen
resolution. Is this similar to what other people have been experiencing?
Have b
El lunes, 2 de mayo de 2016 7:01:23 (CEST), Simon Fels
escribió:
On 30.04.2016 23:14, Francisco Mulas Caracuel wrote:
Im running rc-proposed channel and not have this feature.
The only supported device for Wireless Display support so far is the
Meizu MX Pro 5. Even if the Ubuntu rootfs on
On 30.04.2016 23:14, Francisco Mulas Caracuel wrote:
> Im running rc-proposed channel and not have this feature.
The only supported device for Wireless Display support so far is the
Meizu MX Pro 5. Even if the Ubuntu rootfs on each phone is identical we
disable the option for Wireless Display in u
Im running rc-proposed channel and not have this feature.
Sent from my Wiko WAX.
El 30/04/2016 21:33, Francisco Mulas Caracuel escribió:
This feature is working for the bq e4.5,the first ubuntu phone?
--
Enviado con Dekko desde mi dispositivo Ubuntu
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubu
This feature is working for the bq e4.5,the first ubuntu phone?
--
Enviado con Dekko desde mi dispositivo Ubuntu
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help : https://help.launc
11 matches
Mail list logo
