Hi Jamie,
> It is my understanding that U1db is the recommended technology for
> developers
> for things like settings in QML apps (aiui, QML/C++ developers might choose
> QSettings instead).
>
Actually when it comes to storing application settings/preferences for QML
apps, the SDK developers ar
On 01/05/2014 04:29 PM, Nekhelesh Ramananthan wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> So I have been spending my entire weekend trying to figure out U1dB-Qt and
> trying to create a sample test program, I did some of this work with Andrew
> Hayzen from the music app team. While we did succeed in implementing so
Hi Andrew,
I discussed our situation with Christian on IRC today and showed him my
sample app. Unfortunately it seems that it was a bug. Technically speaking
an index expression defined as ["playlist.name", "playlist.tracks.file",
"playlist.tracks.file"] should work. However there is a bug which I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for your quick reply, please see my comments embedded below.
On 06/01/14 12:17, Christian Dywan wrote:
> On 2014-01-05 23:29, Nekhelesh Ramananthan wrote:
>> So I have been spending my entire weekend trying to figure out
>> U1dB-Qt and trying t
On 2014-01-05 23:29, Nekhelesh Ramananthan wrote:
> So I have been spending my entire weekend trying to figure out U1dB-Qt
> and trying to create a sample test program, I did some of this work
> with Andrew Hayzen from the music app team. While we did succeed in
> implementing some basic functional
Hi everyone,
So I have been spending my entire weekend trying to figure out U1dB-Qt and
trying to create a sample test program, I did some of this work with Andrew
Hayzen from the music app team. While we did succeed in implementing some
basic functionalities like static and dynamic document creat
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Nekhelesh Ramananthan
> wrote:
>>
>> This email is concerning persistent storage options for an Ubuntu Touch
>> application developer. I hope this doesn't turn out to be a big email, but
>> in any case here i
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Nekhelesh Ramananthan
wrote:
This email is concerning persistent storage options for an Ubuntu
Touch application developer. I hope this doesn't turn out to be a big
email, but in any case here is a short summary of this email. What is
the future of U1dB-Qt? Cur
Hi David,
Yes, I was referring to the lack of persistent storage apis as you
> perceived to being only two available from within the qt infrastructure.
> I was stating earlier there is a whole universe of persistent storage
> apis available from the non-qt ubuntu repos: boost serialization,
> mong
On 01/04/2014 03:54 PM, Nekhelesh Ramananthan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:34 PM, David Marceau
> wrote:
>
>> I do believe you are highly mistaken.
>>
>
> I am a bit confused as to which statement of mine you were referring to
> here. My best guess would be my statement ab
Hi David,
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:34 PM, David Marceau wrote:
> I do believe you are highly mistaken.
>
I am a bit confused as to which statement of mine you were referring to
here. My best guess would be my statement about there being only two
storage options which are Qt LocalStorage and U1d
I do believe you are highly mistaken.
It is true QT For Android can be painful when leaving the comfortable
confines of non-gui stuff because more probably than not you have to
resort to JNI work. i.e. Multimedia/3D/OpenCL/OpenGL, databases. That
certainly would affirm your limited api difficulti
Hello everyone,
This email is concerning persistent storage options for an Ubuntu Touch
application developer. I hope this doesn't turn out to be a big email, but
in any case here is a short summary of this email. What is the future of
U1dB-Qt? Currently the documentation and tutorials for using U
13 matches
Mail list logo
