On 13 September 2013 19:20, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> Some of the overlay filesystems do support writing tomb markers to
> handle deletions as well. I'm sure you know that, though, so I'm
> mostly wondering why that was not a good option? Performance?
>
Ubuntu Touch images are not using any over
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:42:36 +0200
Michael Zanetti wrote:
> On Friday 13 September 2013 17:33:47 Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > it is currently not possible to switch on ssh in a persistent way, but with
> > the next image in the daily-proposed channel (build number >46) this should
> > be fixed. due
Some of the overlay filesystems do support writing tomb markers to
handle deletions as well. I'm sure you know that, though, so I'm
mostly wondering why that was not a good option? Performance?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:42:36 +0200
> Michael
On Friday 13 September 2013 17:33:47 Oliver Grawert wrote:
> it is currently not possible to switch on ssh in a persistent way, but with
> the next image in the daily-proposed channel (build number >46) this should
> be fixed. due to the nature of the readonly image you can not just remove
> the .o
hi,
as a followup to sergios mail here a few notes about ssh on the readonly touch
images.
since we want to be able to use ssh on the readonly image without making the
whole image RW we now include it by default.
this inclusion required some changes to the packages default behavior.
normally ss
5 matches
Mail list logo
