On Jul 20, 2016 4:15 PM, "Alan Bell" wrote:
>
> On 15/07/16 14:56, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>>
>> On 07/15/2016 12:41 PM, Sam Bull wrote:
>>>
>>> The first thing I'd like to see changed, is that the accuracy of
>>> the location should consider the time that has passed since that
>>> location record
On 15/07/16 14:56, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 07/15/2016 12:41 PM, Sam Bull wrote:
The first thing I'd like to see changed, is that the accuracy of
the location should consider the time that has passed since that
location recording. E.g. A GPS position might be 10m accuracy, but
if it is 30s lat
El viernes, 15 de julio de 2016 10h'02:57 ART, Dave Morley
escribió:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:43:32 +0100
Alan Bell wrote:
On 15/07/16 13:00, Tomas Öqvist wrote:
>>
> How much of the location problem is actually software related? I
> used a Bq Aquaris E4.5 for over a year and I agree that th
So I'd like to briefly put in my experience: on boot, the nearby scope
shows me stuff from Texas or Kansas (I'm in NC), then I launch uNav get it
to lock on my position which takes some moments, and then go back to
Today/Nearby and refresh them with my actual real location.
This is waay too te
Thanks Alan, that's really helpful!
Thomas
On Jul 15, 2016 4:26 PM, "Alan Bell" wrote:
>
>
> On 15/07/16 14:51, Thomas Voß wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 15/07/16 14:02, Dave Morley wrote:
>>>
Alan your logic seems to be flawed, I get gps on go
On 15/07/16 14:51, Thomas Voß wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
On 15/07/16 14:02, Dave Morley wrote:
Alan your logic seems to be flawed, I get gps on google maps in the
no no no. Google maps is fine, always. It subscribes to updates. This is
about things that do *no
On 15/07/16 14:46, Michael Zanetti wrote:
On 15.07.2016 15:27, Alan Bell wrote:
>
>
>On 15/07/16 14:02, Dave Morley wrote:
>>Alan your logic seems to be flawed, I get gps on google maps in the
>no no no. Google maps is fine, always. It subscribes to updates. This is
>about things that do*not*
On 07/15/2016 12:41 PM, Sam Bull wrote:
> The first thing I'd like to see changed, is that the accuracy of
> the location should consider the time that has passed since that
> location recording. E.g. A GPS position might be 10m accuracy, but
> if it is 30s later, then that should give something li
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Alberto Mardegan
wrote:
> On 07/15/2016 12:41 PM, Sam Bull wrote:
>> The first thing I'd like to see changed, is that the accuracy of
>> the location should consider the time that has passed since that
>> location recording. E.g. A GPS position might be 10m accurac
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
>
>
> On 15/07/16 14:02, Dave Morley wrote:
>>
>> Alan your logic seems to be flawed, I get gps on google maps in the
>
> no no no. Google maps is fine, always. It subscribes to updates. This is
> about things that do *not* subscribe to updates, th
On 15.07.2016 15:27, Alan Bell wrote:
>
>
> On 15/07/16 14:02, Dave Morley wrote:
>> Alan your logic seems to be flawed, I get gps on google maps in the
> no no no. Google maps is fine, always. It subscribes to updates. This is
> about things that do *not* subscribe to updates, things that just
On 15/07/16 14:02, Dave Morley wrote:
Alan your logic seems to be flawed, I get gps on google maps in the
no no no. Google maps is fine, always. It subscribes to updates. This is
about things that do *not* subscribe to updates, things that just want
to know where you are.
For example
https:/
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:43:32 +0100
Alan Bell wrote:
> On 15/07/16 13:00, Tomas Öqvist wrote:
> >>
> > How much of the location problem is actually software related? I
> > used a Bq Aquaris E4.5 for over a year and I agree that the
> > location service was useless 99% of the time. I am now using
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 14:00 +0200, Tomas Öqvist wrote:
> How much of the location problem is actually software related? I
> used a Bq Aquaris E4.5 for over a year and I agree that the location
> service was useless 99% of the time. I am now using a Pro 5, and the
> location service on this phone i
On 15/07/16 13:38, Sam Bull wrote:
Agreed, the location service works great for me under uNav. But, for
the Weather app, it requests a location and gets an ancient cached
location. If I restart the app a few minutes later, it seems to update
to the correct location. So, it seems to me, that the
On 15/07/16 13:00, Tomas Öqvist wrote:
How much of the location problem is actually software related? I used
a Bq Aquaris E4.5 for over a year and I agree that the location
service was useless 99% of the time. I am now using a Pro 5, and the
location service on this phone is working much be
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 10:55 +0100, Alan Bell wrote:
> getCurrentPosition does have an option to specify a max age and
> request high accuracy
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/PositionOptions but
> I am not sure that we respect those options or just disregard them
> and hand out j
On 15/07/16 10:41, Sam Bull wrote:
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 15:13 +0100, Alan Bell wrote:
and the utterly broken location services
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/location-service/+bug/15546
04
the only way to get a location is to use a moving dot map
application
and wait and wait for a
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 15:13 +0100, Alan Bell wrote:
> and the utterly broken location services
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/location-service/+bug/15546
> 04
>
> the only way to get a location is to use a moving dot map
> application
> and wait and wait for a fix, then you can go to
I have the production BQ 4.5 phone, with the inverted selfie camera,
hopefully fixed in OTA12
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1567542
and the utterly broken location services
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1567542
https://bugs.launc
ALL of these things were working pretty much fine for me the last time
I tried to use them, on my Nexus 5 with Ubuntu.
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 13:21 +0100, Alan Bell wrote:
> presumably Pokemon Go isn't going to do much catching on Ubuntu
> Touch?
> If location services ever becomes functional and
presumably Pokemon Go isn't going to do much catching on Ubuntu Touch?
If location services ever becomes functional and starts handing out
current location data rather than where you were last week, and the
cameras are the right way up it appears that a standards based web
application could be
22 matches
Mail list logo
