Hey everyone,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <
lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Right, it might sound a bit scary indeed. The main thing that Didier
> wanted to say is that we want all the tests to be reliable.
I totally agree
> We no longer
> do re-runs in
Hello Thomi,
Right, it might sound a bit scary indeed. The main thing that Didier
wanted to say is that we want all the tests to be reliable. We no longer
do re-runs in case of tests that are failing (due to flakiness) and are
no longer allowed to release a component that has an unreliable test.
T
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Didier Roche wrote:
> As we are really close to our target of 100% of tests reliably passing and
> there is not anymore any known "can't launch app" blockers, it's time to
> look at getting all flaky tests disabled or fixed. It's completely
> reachable to get
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> +Thomi - is there any way to tell the difference between the app not
> being started and autopilot not finding it?
>
The upstart codepath makes this obvious, and the new autopilot version
that's coming soon makes this more obvious for the
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Bill Filler wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 12:26 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
>
> Hey everyone.
>
> Good news first:
> the qmlscene crash and a lot of other bugs while opening the apps are now
> fixed. A consequence is also that the test pass rate jumped above 98% as
> the who
* unity8 (Kevin)
5 flaky tests on maguro:
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/55:20131209.1:20131203/5355/unity8-autopilot/558729/
(1
fail on run 55)
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/56:20131210:20131203/5363/unity8-autopilot/
(4
other failures on run 56)
[kg ]upon fur
On 12/10/2013 12:26 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
> Hey everyone.
>
> Good news first:
> the qmlscene crash and a lot of other bugs while opening the apps are
> now fixed. A consequence is also that the test pass rate jumped above
> 98% as the whole system is way more reliable! Well done everyone. :)
>
>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote:
> For the stuff I'm listed under;
>
> * ubuntu-weather-app (Nicholas):
> Fixed, pull trunk
>
Updated landing plan, still get failures
> * ubuntu-file-manager (Nicholas):
> Fixed, pull trunk
>
INARCHIVE
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Olivier Tilloy <
olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Olivier Tilloy
>> wrote:
>> > Is it common for the webbrowser-app tests to fail, be re-run, and then
>> pass?
>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Olivier Tilloy <
olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
>
>> Le 11/12/2013 12:38, Olivier Tilloy a écrit :
>>
>> * notes-app (Bill)
>>> One test failing on both mako and maguro:
>>>
>>> http://ci.ubuntu
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Olivier Tilloy
> wrote:
> > Is it common for the webbrowser-app tests to fail, be re-run, and then
> pass?
> > Does that happen weekly, daily, more often? Has it always been the case,
> or
> > did it start hap
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Olivier Tilloy
> wrote:
> > Is it common for the webbrowser-app tests to fail, be re-run, and then
> pass?
> > Does that happen weekly, daily, more often? Has it always been the case,
> or
> > did it start hap
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Olivier Tilloy
wrote:
> Is it common for the webbrowser-app tests to fail, be re-run, and then pass?
> Does that happen weekly, daily, more often? Has it always been the case, or
> did it start happening recently?
> When it does happen, does the second run always
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
> Le 11/12/2013 12:38, Olivier Tilloy a écrit :
>
> * notes-app (Bill)
>> One test failing on both mako and maguro:
>>
>> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/55:20131209.1:20131203/5355/notes-app-autopilot/558827/
>>
>> http://
hi all,
first i'd like to thank gmail for hiding/not delivering this mail for a
full day...awesome
* unity8 (Kevin)
5 flaky tests on maguro:
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/55:20131209.1:20131203/5355/unity8-autopilot/558729/
(1
fail on run 55)
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/
On 11/12/13 14:32, Chris K wrote:
> Hi Team.
>
> Thanks for pushing out an update. I watch the threads and I am sure
> this is a ton of work. I am just a fan that got a N4 specifically for
> UT. I am hoping to use it as a daily driver at some point.
>
> I just booted up the latest build on a N
love how intuitive
it is. It is truly something different and is very enjoyable.
Chris
From: tiago.herrm...@canonical.com
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:57:55 -0200
To: didro...@ubuntu.com
CC: a...@canonical.com; ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 10.12.13
On Tue
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
>
> * messaging-app (Bill):
> One flaky test on mako. (can be sdk related)
>
> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/55:20131209.1:20131203/5356/messaging-app-autopilot/558958/
>
As far as I can see, the osk can't be closed by autopil
On 11/12/13 11:47, Didier Roche wrote:
> Le 11/12/2013 12:38, Olivier Tilloy a écrit :
>>
>> * notes-app (Bill)
>> One test failing on both mako and maguro:
>>
>> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/55:20131209.1:20131203/5355/notes-app-autopilot/558827/
>>
>> http://
Le 11/12/2013 12:38, Olivier Tilloy a écrit :
* notes-app (Bill)
One test failing on both mako and maguro:
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/55:20131209.1:20131203/5355/notes-app-autopilot/558827/
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/55:20131209.1:20131
>
> * notes-app (Bill)
> One test failing on both mako and maguro:
>
> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/55:20131209.1:20131203/5355/notes-app-autopilot/558827/
>
> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/55:20131209.1:20131203/5356/notes-app-autopilot/558857/
> 3 flaky tests
Le 11/12/2013 10:20, Tomas Ö a écrit :
I just checked for updates on my Nexus 4 and I got r33!? I thought we
were waiting for r58 to be promoted?
It's part of the issue we are facing right now.
The latest image has been labeled image 33 when promoting, but the
content is image 57 (which is
I just checked for updates on my Nexus 4 and I got r33!? I thought we
were waiting for r58 to be promoted?
/Tomas
Den den 11 december 2013 04:41:55 skrev Nicholas Skaggs:
For the stuff I'm listed under;
* ubuntu-weather-app (Nicholas):
Fixed, pull trunk
* ubuntu-file-manager (Nicholas):
Fixe
For the stuff I'm listed under;
* ubuntu-weather-app (Nicholas):
Fixed, pull trunk
* ubuntu-file-manager (Nicholas):
Fixed, pull trunk
* music-app (Nicholas):
Fixed, waiting for dev approval;
https://code.launchpad.net/~nskaggs/music-app/fix-shuffle-test/+merge/198485
* calendar-app (Nichola
Hey everyone.
Good news first:
the qmlscene crash and a lot of other bugs while opening the apps are
now fixed. A consequence is also that the test pass rate jumped above
98% as the whole system is way more reliable! Well done everyone. :)
Bad news: image #55 couldn't be promoted because of a
25 matches
Mail list logo
