On 09/18/2013 11:24 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 09:31 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on
>> ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework
>> yet!
>>
>> This should be as backwards
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> I think these should be added-- we are seeing apps using them and/or have
> apparmor policy groups for them
> qtdeclarative5-qtorganizer-plugin (calendar)
> qtorganizer5-eds - required by qtdeclarative5-qtorganizer-plugin
> qtdeclarative5-
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013, Colin Watson wrote:
> That's true, but if all the systems we care about have all the
> frameworks, then we don't really gain anything. I'd just leave it at a
> simple single-framework system for 13.10 and expand later.
I thought the timelines of maintaining backwards-compati
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 05:39:39PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013, Colin Watson wrote:
> > We designed click so that it could support multiple frameworks in the
> > future, but it doesn't yet. If all these putative frameworks are going
> > to be in the Ubuntu Touch images anyway,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013, Colin Watson wrote:
> I guess you mean 14.04 here.
Yeah :-)
> > Also, do we want multiple frameworks, notably for webapps or for cordova?
> We designed click so that it could support multiple frameworks in the
> future, but it doesn't yet. If all these putative frameworks
On 18 September 2013 10:48, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 18 September 2013 09:31, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on
>> ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework
>> yet!
>>
>> This should be as
Hi,
On Thursday 19 September 2013 17:27:08 Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> Can we please have these two packages in the -dev list:
>
> - qtbase5-private-dev
> - qtdeclarative5-private-dev
>
> Although these packages are "private", they hold fundamental headers
> of Qt which enables the creation of
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Michael Zanetti
wrote:
> On Thursday 19 September 2013 17:27:08 Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
>> Can we please have these two packages in the -dev list:
>>
>> - qtbase5-private-dev
>> - qtdeclarative5-private-dev
>>
>> Although these packages are "private", they hold
On Wednesday 18 September 2013 16:31:51 Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on
> ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework
> yet!
>
> This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to
Can we please have these two packages in the -dev list:
- qtbase5-private-dev
- qtdeclarative5-private-dev
Although these packages are "private", they hold fundamental headers
of Qt which enables the creation of dynamic meta objects, necessary
for bindings such as Go, Python, and even QML its
On 09/18/2013 09:31 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on
> ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework
> yet!
>
> This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to
> 12.04) so tha
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to
> 12.04)
I guess you mean 14.04 here.
> Also, do we want multiple frameworks, notably for webapps or for cordova?
We designed click so that it could support multiple
On 18 September 2013 09:31, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on
> ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework
> yet!
>
> This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to
> 12.04) so
Le 18/09/2013 16:31, Loïc Minier a écrit :
[...]
Also, do we want multiple frameworks, notably for webapps or for cordova?
A quick reply on that question: the 2 packages represent the 2 parts of
what an HTML5 app can use locally: the UI toolkit (ubuntu-html5-theme),
or the low-level platform ac
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on
> ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework
> yet!
>
> This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to
> 12.0
I'm additionally specifically curious about
whether qtdeclarative5-qtaudioengine-plugin can be dropped. This is the
QtAudioEngine Qml plugin.
It would make the MIR for qtmultimedia much easier. Does anyone actually
use QtAudioEngine? No packages in the archive claim to.
Here's my proposal to d
Hi!
Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on
ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework
yet!
This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to
12.04) so that apps in the appstore don't need to be ported to a new
API
17 matches
Mail list logo
