Rodney Dawes [2014-08-26 15:33 -0400]:
> If the changes are already in utopic, but we do not expect any further
> changes on a package, thus it won't get a silo through normal activity,
> what is the recommended way to get it synced to ubuntu-rtm, as it's
> clear this won't happen automatically by
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Rodney Dawes
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:11 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> 1. SRCCOPY from utopic silo to RTM silo landing option AVAILABLE
>>
>> This wasn't clearly announced, but has been done successful
On Aug 26, 2014 12:34 PM, "Rodney Dawes"
> If the changes are already in utopic, but we do not expect any further
> changes on a package, thus it won't get a silo through normal activity,
> what is the recommended way to get it synced to ubuntu-rtm, as it's
> clear this won't happen automatically b
On martes 26 de agosto de 2014 16h'33:58 ART, Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:11 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
1. SRCCOPY from utopic silo to RTM silo landing option AVAILABLE
This wasn't clearly announced, but has been done succes
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:11 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 1. SRCCOPY from utopic silo to RTM silo landing option AVAILABLE
>
> This wasn't clearly announced, but has been done successfully at least
> twice and I think it should eliminate a big c
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 3. QA sign off for features only
> ===
> One concern was about how we can land all the fixes for all the bugs
> with this QA sign-off burden. This was never planned to be the case,
> but since the TRAINCON-0 rule seem t
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch/
#208 mako
-
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch/mako/208:20140826:20140811.1/9954/
* Some useful documentation:
(Still under development)
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/citrain/ComponentSupportList
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/citrain/LandingTeam
Hello everyone,
As we know that landing your changes into the ubuntu-rtm distribution
can be a bit troublesome, we are working on different fronts to make
sure this is as less painful as possible. While we're still in the
middle of making the CI Train more automated in this regard, in the
meantim
Hi all,
Since we branched off last week there has been a good amount of
productive and emotional discussion about the difficulties the ramp up
the new RTM landing process puts on landers and landing team.
After discussing with the wider team and stakeholders, we identified
three key points that w
-
Latest in Unity8 ui
-
Iteration and getting ready to land remaining header/preview
customization and favoriting scopes
-
Landed life cycle rework which handles of killed apps restarts
-
Continued working on bug/enhancement around trusted sessions f
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 16:54 +0200, Fabio Colella wrote:
> There is also the problem of background syncing. Is any service
> currently available for that? Because it would be really weird if the
> user has to wait with the app open while up or downloading..
No, there would need to be an OwnCloud mo
There is also the problem of background syncing. Is any service currently
available for that? Because it would be really weird if the user has to
wait with the app open while up or downloading..
2014-08-26 16:48 GMT+02:00 Michael Zanetti :
>
> On 26.08.2014 10:21, Mitchell Reese wrote:
>
>> Exce
On 26.08.2014 10:21, Mitchell Reese wrote:
Except that Owncloud syncs files as well as calendar & contacts. There
would need to be some way to choose which folders were going to be
synced. I'm guessing this will require some kind of front end.
Right... I didn't read your previous mail careful
First of all: Great to see an owncloud project for ubuntu touch. I know
that very many people will be looking out for this one.
Except that Owncloud syncs files as well as calendar & contacts. There
would need to be some way to choose which folders were going to be synced.
I'm guessing this will r
Except that Owncloud syncs files as well as calendar & contacts. There
would need to be some way to choose which folders were going to be
synced. I'm guessing this will require some kind of front end.
M
On 26/08/14 17:50, Michael Zanetti wrote:
On 26.08.2014 05:37, Mitchell Reese wrote:
Is t
W dniu 26.08.2014 o 05:37, Mitchell Reese pisze:
Is there any reason owncloudcmd couldn't be included in the default
builds? It would simplify our task enormously - at least as far as file
syncing goes. Then all we need to do is write a qml app for a front-end.
We can always expand on the idea la
On 26.08.2014 05:37, Mitchell Reese wrote:
Is there any reason owncloudcmd couldn't be included in the default
builds? It would simplify our task enormously - at least as far as
file syncing goes. Then all we need to do is write a qml app for a
front-end. We can always expand on the idea later
17 matches
Mail list logo
