Hey,
A special edition today of the landing team email with the copy of the
release note as we promote and move #302 to the stable channel today
(marked as #11). We got some unexpected firedrills until the very end,
but where would be the fun without this? ;)
For completeness and what we saw
Hey,
As described on previous email, the landing team will be off as most of
you I guess for easter holidays. We will resume be back operations
helping on SRUs and starting to ram up on normal landing business on
Tuesday.
Happy easter holidays everyone and thanks for the great work enabling us
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 10:26 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> Correct, that external tool would be a click hook that the click scope
> would install. Basically similar to the hook that UAL installs today.
> The architecture would be similar to how URL dispatcher does things:
Well, it would be the hook, an
Those are the same language packs currently installed on the phone
images as well. This is what I meant by them including too much. A very
large number of the translations provided by these -base packages are
totally not useful on the phone. Heck, a very large number of the
translations aren't even
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 11:09 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 09:52 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:10 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 19:11 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > > Rodney Dawes [2014-04-16 13:02 -0400]:
> > > > > We're talkin
On 04/17/2014 09:22 AM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 09:09 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
>> Just noting that our traditional deb based lang packs approach (for core
>> stuff)
>> in the context of the monolithic system image enables:
>> * producing stock Ubuntu devices with as wide a s
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Rodney Dawes
wrote:
> The main issue with the current debs system is that we are shipping a
> lot of translations we don't actually need to be on the system, because
> our language pack debs are built from the requirements of the full
> Ubuntu ISO, and not the phon
>
> ** New scopes performance needs to be improved (Kevin for unity8 and
> Thomas for unity-scopes-shell)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1297197
> This explains most of the chopiness and some temporary lagginess we have
> seen in the Unity 8 UI past weeks with the new scop
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 09:52 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:10 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 19:11 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > Rodney Dawes [2014-04-16 13:02 -0400]:
> > > > We're talking about one app loading the translations for all apps.
> > >
> >
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:10 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 19:11 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Rodney Dawes [2014-04-16 13:02 -0400]:
> > > We're talking about one app loading the translations for all apps.
> >
> > FWIW, that might be too slow regardless of which approach we u
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 10:24 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
> So to be clear, I don't really care if it is debs or not. It's just that debs
> already work (except for the requirement to add translations/languages at
> runtime). And we have a fully functioning set of things that enable:
> * customized i
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 09:09 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
> Just noting that our traditional deb based lang packs approach (for core
> stuff)
> in the context of the monolithic system image enables:
> * producing stock Ubuntu devices with as wide a set of languages as is wanted
> * while also allowi
On 04/17/2014 06:54 AM, Christian Dywan wrote:
> On 2014-04-17 03:27, Rodney Dawes wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 19:04 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
>>> On 04/16/2014 01:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>>
> And the convenience of lang packs would only be for things where we
>> are the upstream (
I guess there's an issue with upgrading vs installing from fresh. I'm on 14.04
R299, and it isnt installed. I will wipe it and re-install. I guess that
should fix my issue.
I'm really excited that this will work. UT is coming a long way. It's still
funny how after I play with UT or a while
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2014, 08:21 -0400 schrieb Chris K:
> Tomas, how did you install syncevolution-provider-uoa? I've have
> tried from the phone, and from a computer, and my result is:
it is installed by default ... (at least on 14.04 images)
ciao
oli
signature.asc
Description
Tomas, how did you install syncevolution-provider-uoa? I've have tried from
the phone, and from a computer, and my result is:
W: Not using locking for read only lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock
E: Unable to write to /var/cache/apt/
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
On 2014-04-17 03:27, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 19:04 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
>> On 04/16/2014 01:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>
And the convenience of lang packs would only be for things where we
> are the upstream (and probably only things that are in the image
> i
Hi guys,
While developing a rest scope (lp:ubuntu-rest-scopes) I found there was no
convenient way to test the scope on a real device itself. Here's a way you
can achieve that.
0. First, ensure your work machine and phone are on the same network
On your work machine in ubuntu-rest-scopes/
1) Upd
18 matches
Mail list logo
