On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Manuel de la Pena
wrote:
>
> I don't like the fact that udm is dooimd the click package installations but
> it is done because there is no guarantee that the scope will be around to
> deal with the download. We should think a better approach and let udm do one
> onl
On 03/01/2014 06:08 AM, Nekhelesh Ramananthan wrote:
Hi,
2. Clock apps flaky tests (Nicholas + QA team?)
Nicholas is off today and has still 2 bugs on the list (see his
answer on the ML yesterday). Mathieu is going to reach the QA guys to
help unblocking that one.
I got some news on this fr
"The default update mechanism is therefore image based. We build new images on our build infrastructure, generate diffs between images and publish the result on the public server." - part of Stéphane Graber's post. Fox example, I have...1036 build of UT. Current version is 2056. As far as I underst
This is the cm tree .
just from curiousity :
Where would I get jfltexx 4.4.2 source and how would I use it with ubuntu touch
tree (I thought ut needed cm10.1 with no dalvik)
and just a note / with phablet-dev-bootstrap . I always have to go through it
fixing file links for libstagefright #incl
hi,
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb f69m:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondered, if there is any work in progress to allow making ports
> using the new system image available, similar to
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/MakingPortsAvailable?
>
see:
https://www.stgraber.org/2014/02/11/your-own-
Hi,
Just wondered, if there is any work in progress to allow making ports
using the new system image available, similar to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/MakingPortsAvailable?
Looking at ubuntu-device-flash, I noticed the -server= argument. Setting
up the JSON files for example on GitHub Page
6 matches
Mail list logo
