/UT/external/webrtc/src/modules/audio_processing/debug.proto/UT/external/webrtc/src/modules/audio_processing/test/unittest.proto:
File does not reside within any path specified using --proto_path (or
-I). You must specify a --proto_path which encompasses this file. Note
that the proto_path mus
hi,
Am Samstag, den 01.03.2014, 20:53 +0100 schrieb Łukasz 'sil2100'
Zemczak:
> Hi everyone,
>
> So, I went in and did a priority landing of the fix. Alan helped me out
> testing the whole test plan and we decided to land it. Reverting was a
> bad idea since the silo had a few different components
On 1 Mar 2014 18:54, "Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak" <
lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder then why the silo was marked as 'Tested: Yes' if the basic
> testplan wasn't completed? It was also my fault for letting it through
> and I'm really pissed about that. Apologies here.
No big
Hi everyone,
So, I went in and did a priority landing of the fix. Alan helped me out
testing the whole test plan and we decided to land it. Reverting was a
bad idea since the silo had a few different components in it, so it was
more straightforward this way. Hopefully the next image will be fine.
On 1 Mar 2014 19:49, "Barry Warsaw" wrote:
>
> On Mar 01, 2014, at 03:35 PM, Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> >There was also a lack of thorough verification on my side as one of the
> >landers: I asked "did you guys check this" because I could not. I did not
> >ask "did you guys follow the whole test pl
On 1 Mar 2014 20:54, "Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak" <
lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> So, I went in and did a priority landing of the fix. Alan helped me out
> testing the whole test plan and we decided to land it. Reverting was a
> bad idea since the silo had a few different
On Mar 01, 2014, at 03:35 PM, Roberto Alsina wrote:
>There was also a lack of thorough verification on my side as one of the
>landers: I asked "did you guys check this" because I could not. I did not
>ask "did you guys follow the whole test plan?"
>
>So, a learning opportunity all around :-(
Seve
There was also a lack of thorough verification on my side as one of the
landers: I asked "did you guys check this" because I could not. I did not
ask "did you guys follow the whole test plan?"
So, a learning opportunity all around :-(
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Ma
On Mar 01, 2014, at 06:54 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote:
>I wonder then why the silo was marked as 'Tested: Yes' if the basic
>testplan wasn't completed? It was also my fault for letting it through
>and I'm really pissed about that. Apologies here.
My guess is that we were so focused on fixi
Hi,
I wonder then why the silo was marked as 'Tested: Yes' if the basic
testplan wasn't completed? It was also my fault for letting it through
and I'm really pissed about that. Apologies here.
Manuel - could you add a landing for this branch? I'll take care of it,
test it and release it during th
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Manuel de la Pena
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manuel de la Pena
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken
>>> ubuntu-download-manager). This
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Manuel de la Pena <
manuel.delap...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manuel de la Pena <
> manuel.delap...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Image #213 (and subsequent
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manuel de la Pena <
manuel.delap...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken
>> ubuntu-download-manager). This will prevent (amongst other things)
>> being abl
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken
> ubuntu-download-manager). This will prevent (amongst other things)
> being able to install packages from the store. Bug filed:-
>
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
Hi,
Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken
ubuntu-download-manager). This will prevent (amongst other things)
being able to install packages from the store. Bug filed:-
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-download-manager/+bug/1286553
If you have already upgraded, you
Hi,
2. Clock apps flaky tests (Nicholas + QA team?)
Nicholas is off today and has still 2 bugs on the list (see his
answer on the ML yesterday). Mathieu is going to reach the QA guys to
help unblocking that one.
I got some news on this from the clock app side. So as Leo mentioned in
his ema
16 matches
Mail list logo
